Do you have any ideas or thoughts about this?

  • Apepollo11@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    It’s just a greater level of abstraction. First we talked to the computers on their own terms with punch cards.

    Then Assembly came along to simplify the process, allowing humans to write readable code while compiling into Machine Code so the computers can run it.

    Then we used higher-level languages like C to create the Assembly Code required.

    Then we created languages like Python, that were even more human-readable, doing a lot more of the heavy lifting than C.

    I understand the concern, but it’s just the latest step in a process that has been playing out since programming became a thing. At every step we give up some control, for the benefit of making our jobs easier.

    • theparadox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      I disagree. Even high level languages will consistently produce the same results. There may be low level differences depending on the compiler and the system’s architecture but if those are consistent you will get the same results.

      AI coding isn’t an extremely human readable higher level programming language. Using an LLM to generate code adds a literal black box and the interpretation of the user and LLM’s human language (which humans can’t even do consistently) to the equation.