• Xraygoggles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      I’m not quite sure about this one. I think that the current design on the reverse is an issue. But the front doesn’t seem to break any laws.

      I’m assuming they print these under subsection Y of 31 U.S. Code § 5112 - Denominations, specifications, and design of coins. Which pertains to these 250th anniversary coins.

      The part I see mentioned in this thread frequently applies to a separate subsection (n) for a run of $1 presidential coins that has since ended.

      If you just read subsection Y in a vacuum, they are good to go. This part at the bottom though says that the reverse can’t be a ‘portrait’.

      So this isn’t really slam dunk illegal, but I don’t think that the draft of the coins reverse will make it to print. I would fully expect the front to come out just like that though based on my interpretation.

      (aa)Standards and General Provisions for Circulating Collectible Coins Under Subsections (x), (y), and (z).—

      (1)Prohibition on certain representations.—

      No head and shoulders portrait or bust of any person, living or dead, and no portrait of a living person may be included in the design on the reverse of any coin under subsections (x), (y), and (z).

      • skisnow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        I don’t know much about the law, but it feels like the ‘Fight fight fight’ side is overtly party political.

  • hcf@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 days ago

    This is just bait for people to point out that it’s illegal to commemorate a living president.

    At which point they’ll feign “oopsies” and—surprising absolutely nobody—proceed to roll out a Charlie Kirk coin.

    • echo@lemmy.tf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      There’s already shitloads of ads out there for privately minted Kuck rounds

  • Dragomus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 days ago

    Kings and queens have legal tender with their face on it during their tenure…

    When is the official coronation of trump scheduled? 2027?

    • Makeitstop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      Given that it doesn’t meet the legal requirements for currency but they would be passing it off as real money, it sounds more like counterfeiting to me. One more charge to add to the list.

  • 4am@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 days ago

    I knew it, Steven Miller has been “Weekend-at-Bernie’s”-ing him for two years and so now he’s eligible to have his face on money

  • paraphrand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    If such a coin exists ever exists, I hope all of them end up with deep scratches across the face.

    Also, “Fight fight fight” sounds more like the Itchy and Scratchy theme song than some democratic saying.

  • klu9@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    So… how easy would these be to load in a shotgun?

    Asking for a friend. Who appreciates irony.