• quick_snail@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        10 days ago

        But they’re not banning downloading and installing programs. What are they blocking, specifically?

        • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          They’re banning programs from being installed unless the installation has their consent

            • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              9 days ago

              It’s not a suggestion for an alternative. Sideloading is not even blocked: unblocked apps remain sideloadable. Sideloading is not “fucking anti-property-rights loaded language” & the word existed a while before Android OS.

              They’re just being uninformed drama-queens as usual.

              • sexhaver87@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                8 days ago

                It is a fairly loaded word, implying it’s an alternative method of loading data to the primary, more actively vendor-supported method. Those methods you previously mentioned are actively subverting the primary application install methods (Google Play) and are 1 minor software update from being completely axed. Name-calling an opposing “they” is not quite productive.

                • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 days ago

                  Name-calling an opposing “they”

                  “They” is now a dirty word?

                  Sideload wasn’t a loaded language before Android OS and still isn’t: it’s a bogus, overreactive claim.

                  All of them are valid install methods. Developers will always need a way to load their experimental apps not yet suitable for release: they won’t block the methods they need to do that.

                  Clear use cases for casual users exist for

                  • deterring them from installing software by bad actors that’s known to be malicious
                  • verifying non-malicious software hasn’t been modified possibly maliciously before installing it.

                  “They” are drama-queens, because despite legitimate use cases to address actual problems posing high-cost risks to users (even as Google turns out to be a shitty authority) & clear documentation that power users can still install any package they want, they choose to catastrophize.