• quick_snail@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 days ago

    But they’re not banning downloading and installing programs. What are they blocking, specifically?

    • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      They’re banning programs from being installed unless the installation has their consent

        • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          It’s not a suggestion for an alternative. Sideloading is not even blocked: unblocked apps remain sideloadable. Sideloading is not “fucking anti-property-rights loaded language” & the word existed a while before Android OS.

          They’re just being uninformed drama-queens as usual.

          • sexhaver87@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            It is a fairly loaded word, implying it’s an alternative method of loading data to the primary, more actively vendor-supported method. Those methods you previously mentioned are actively subverting the primary application install methods (Google Play) and are 1 minor software update from being completely axed. Name-calling an opposing “they” is not quite productive.

            • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 days ago

              Name-calling an opposing “they”

              “They” is now a dirty word?

              Sideload wasn’t a loaded language before Android OS and still isn’t: it’s a bogus, overreactive claim.

              All of them are valid install methods. Developers will always need a way to load their experimental apps not yet suitable for release: they won’t block the methods they need to do that.

              Clear use cases for casual users exist for

              • deterring them from installing software by bad actors that’s known to be malicious
              • verifying non-malicious software hasn’t been modified possibly maliciously before installing it.

              “They” are drama-queens, because despite legitimate use cases to address actual problems posing high-cost risks to users (even as Google turns out to be a shitty authority) & clear documentation that power users can still install any package they want, they choose to catastrophize.