The top European Union court ruled on Tuesday that public authorities in member states can prohibit employees from wearing signs of religious belief, such as an Islamic head scarf, in the latest decision on an issue that has divided Europe for years.

The case came to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) after an employee of the eastern Belgian municipality of Ans was told she could not wear an Islamic head scarf at work.

  • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Welp if you are not bothering to read my replies and pretending you actually understand the meaning of strawman while basing your entire schitck around the least effective ad hominem attacks I’ve encountered then there’s no real reason to continue.

    That you won’t answer even two direct questions to nail down a basic ethical baseline to expand from tells me that even you can’t defend your own position for shit. Not surprising you don’t want to look too closely at your own opinions in the mirror.

    Anyway, it’s been fun.

    • HamSwagwich
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Let me sum up your argument:

      “My religious views are right. As long as I approve of your religious choices they are ok, but I will arbitrarily draw the line where I see fit and if you disagree with me you are wrong.”

      That’s literally what your argument boils down to.

      • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not even a little close. Now I just think you’re dumb as shit and don’t know how to read. Are you a bot? Maybe that explains why you just say the same thing over and over.

        • HamSwagwich
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lol ok… maybe you should go back and read what you’ve written. You are a religious zealot who can’t see the forest for the trees and think that anyone who doesn’t believe in your bullshit is wrong and crazy. Whatever dude. If you think I’m saying the same thing over and over it’s because you keep spouting all your nonsense and I’m trying to educate the terminally stupid, which is obviously a losing battle.

            • HamSwagwich
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Then stop making stupid replies that are full of bullshit and thinking everyone would subscribe to your stupid religion.

              • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yeah, sure. You really aren’t coming across as anybody I would count as an authority. More like a screaming middle schooler in full tantrum…but you are progressively are getting more boring. Don’t you do anything new?

                • HamSwagwich@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I know it’s hard to swallow when someone doesn’t subscribe to your bullshit and just won’t give in to your verbal diarrhea just to get you to shut up… I bet it’s frustrating for you, isn’t it, not getting your way?

                  I’m sorry about your sacred cow and the fact that I won’t acknowledge your bullshit as being somehow legitimate. Go back to your church and pray or whatever dumb shit you need to do to make yourself feel better

                  • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Huh. Should I construe this as Anti-Hinduist sentiments now? I mean I guess that counts as new but it’s not exactly a whole new verse just a slightly different refrain. Still dull. Come on, dig deep show me you are just a little bit interesting.