I’m genuinely interested in people thoughts about the Fediverse because here in the UK it has massively stalled in 2025, like a lot of things. I am seeing way less posts from UK people and way less interaction and general use in fact. Most seem to have stopped social media use to be fair, and I know a lot of that is to do with my age (old fart here, 56 laps round sun and counting) but the numbers game look poor from my point of view. Do we think the Fediverse has a future now after useage appears to be going downwards? Is it a UK thing? (well I know the UK is weird but hey)

  • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Network effects are incredibly strong. Xitter is now a disinformation and fascist hellhole, and yet people who should know better still refuse to leave. We have the advantage that we’re not growth focused, so we can can bide our time. The inevitable enshittification will do its job eventually, but there’s no telling when the tipping point will happen.

    • rglullis@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Network effects are incredibly strong

      Yet, Bluesky has grown to 35M+ active accounts, even though they started way after us

      We have the advantage that we’re not growth focused

      This is not an “advantage”. This is an excuse we tell ourselves to cope with our failures.

      The inevitable enshittification will do its job eventually,

      And when it does, the majority of people will go the next shiny “free as in beer”, VC-funded siloed platform and we are going to be just another “They don’t know” meme.

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Not gonna argue with you mate, I know we disagree fundamentally on what the fediverse means. Me and most others never will see eye to eye with you with your capitalist growth-focused approach.

        • rglullis@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Me and most others

          The “most others” here is a heavily self-selected group of people who don’t want to compromise on any of their values and treat any effort to grow as a threat.

          All of this to say, it’s fine if you say “Yes, we are small and I want it that way because if it gets any bigger we will be surrounded by people who do not uphold the same values we do”. The problem is that you’re arguing “We are only small because of $random_reason (network effects/evil capitalists/not enough funding/etc)”, as if “being small” was determined by external factors and not something that you can control.

          That’s the point of disagreement. I think we can control this and we can bring more people here, but it’s just that you don’t want to do it if means sacrificing your ideology.

          • aasatru@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            group of people who don’t want to compromise on any of their values

            Of course I don’t want to compromise my values in order to see growth of a platform that I use precisely because it aligns with my values.

            • rglullis@communick.news
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              When I say “compromise”, I am not saying “sacrifice them completely”. I am talking about in terms of Big Fedi vs Small Fedi, regardless on where on the scale you want to stay, there are trade-offs to be made.