• korewa@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Certainly, the equipment might become unusable, but rather than disposing of it, they are repurposing it elsewhere. Considering the environmental impact, whether the efficiencies and lower global warming potential (GWP) outweigh the benefits of discarding an already manufactured system, which would necessitate manufacturing anew for compliance, is uncertain.

    I would estimate payback period to align with a lifespan of around 10 years, matching the expected duration of some of these systems. This estimate entirely anecdotal.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      payback period to align with a lifespan of around 10 years

      That’s the critical fact: what is the payback in terms of cost were deployed to drive the decision, and in environmental impact which needs to constrain the decision.

      It’s also important to know wether more inefficient units continued to be manufactured because there was still that secondary market, but calling it “dumping” implies not