cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/38745122
An accused serial killer who was executed for murder in Florida on Thursday used his final words to express support for President Trump after offering comfort to his family and his victims’ families.
Completely on brand.
It’s ok to not call them ‘the accused’ in the midst of an execution
I’m not trying to stand up for this guy but people have been wrongfully executed.
He was convicted for one murder so the serial killing is what he is accused of.
Good and evil are splitting clean. It is like a spiritual battle is forming.
Trump isn’t just a politician. He’s a symbol of pride, greed, and lies.
If you’re still backing him, you’ve picked your side.
The beast was given a mouth to utter proud words and blasphemies and to exercise its authority for forty-two months.
Revelations 13:5
Just quoting the bible, don’t mind me. I mean, it’s right there for all those bible thumpers that support him…
As if those that support him have read any of the bible
Or have any form of reading comprehension
Why do you think they need clergy to read it and interpret it for them? (Read: tell them who to hate)
Way past the 42 month mark there, bub.
An accused serial killer who was executed
LOLWUT
I’m personally happy that The Casanova Killer is now dead. Obviously The Hill didn’t notice The Innocence Project passed this guy right the fuck by.
I thought that was a little strange, but after looking it up, it’s probably a defensible phrasing.
He was only convicted of two murders, while the definition of “serial killer” is three+ murders (plus some other qualifiers). The list of other killings he was suspected of doing, but which were never proven or convicted, would put him in the serial killer category. So it’s fair, in a journalistic sense, to say he was “an accused serial killer.”
A convicted murder, who was also suspected of being a serial killer, …
It’s almost as if clear and concise communication is effective