• boredtortoise@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    10 months ago

    Also same in the Central Railway Station of Helsinki, Finland. Apparently an organic protest without a spokesperson. Protests require to be notified to the police beforehand here so this was a surprise

  • alvvayson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    10 months ago

    It is greatly worrying that the violence there is spilling over to our country.

    The protestors are right and the government is wrong.

    Not in our name. We want no part in crimes against civilians in this Israel-Hamas conflict.

    • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Why don’t you take a guess? How many people really “just support terrorism”? The concept is bizarre.

    • 5BC2E7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      They have attacked pro palestinian supporters that say hamas are terrorist. So a lot of them seem to support terrorism.

      • hh93@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I seriously have the impression that a huge amount of people can only see things in black and white

        They seem to think if someone condemns Hamas they condemn Palestrina as a whole - or that if someone says the terrorism and taking hostages was bad they automatically support whatever Israel is doing since whatever it is it will be less cruel than what Hamas did.

        Why does it seem so bewildering to do many people to see both sides as bad but also see that removing Hamas is a goal that’s worth fighting for as it’s the only road to peace for Palestine?

        What are they protesting FOR - they are only against the current war (which is fine but very shortsighted) as far as I can tell.

        They want them to stay under Hamas control? They don’t want a proposed united Palestine under control of the west bank government?

        They want a Palestine “from the river to the sea” which means all Jews and Israel as a country is gone - but what happens if they won’t go peacefully? Would it be okay to attack civilians to drive them out of the country you claim is yours?

        This whole thing is fucking complex - by picking a side like this it’s cutting too many corners and very shortsighted imho…

  • JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    32
    ·
    10 months ago

    They should go protest to whom is doing the thing, not to bystanders. Hamas and IDF are doing this so maybe they should contact them?

    • Hugucinogens@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      We don’t live in a direct democracy, we live in a representative one. Our representatives are supposed to, you know, represent us, in putting our government’s resources to action according to our intentions.

    • qaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Hamas and IDF are doing this so maybe they should contact them?

      I’m sure that Hamas will lay down it’s arms and the IDF will immediately retreat from Gaza after receiving an angry call from these people.

      • Kalash@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        So it would be just as effective as these “protests”.

        • qaz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          This protest might make it to the “achtuurjournaal” and increase political pressure to actually do something. It’s unlikely that it will, but the chances of it doing anything are better than the alternatives.

          • DarkGamer@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Is one of those alternatives returning the hostages, laying down arms, and negotiating for peace? Because I feel like that’s a much better alternative that’s far more likely to end this conflict, and also something that Palestinians can do to end this immediately. Definitely more effective than shutting down train stations in unrelated countries.

            • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              You do realize the ones shutting down the train stations and the ones in charge of Hamas are not the same group? Pretty stupid to compare them like that. It’s like saying having murderers stop murdering is more effective than having police hunt down murderers and capturing them.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yawn… yet another worthless white moderate whining that other people’s lives and freedom are less important than his convenience.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          MLK has been dead for 50+ years. Claiming he has a position on Netanyahu’s genocidal tactics is utter nonsense.

          • DarkGamer@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            It’s almost like this conflict extends back a long time, and the root causes of it, and cited motivations for violence, haven’t changed since his time.

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              It’s almost like it’s bad-faith trolling to pretend root causes are relevant when we’re actually talking about Israel’s current tactics. It’s pretty fucking disgusting that you apparently can’t agree that genocide is wrong no matter who started it.

              • DarkGamer@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Israel’s current tactics are the result of the position it finds itself in, fighting against a guerilla terrorist government in a densely populated urban area. And that’s because of a long causal chain of events going back to the root causes. King was alive during most of what Palestine considers instigating events, the Nakba, the '67 war…

                Only one side of this conflict explicitly intends to commit genocide, and it’s not Israel. Only one side did commit genocide when they had the upper hand, and it wasn’t Israel. Historical context is relevant and not just yesterday’s tactics, considered in a vacuum.

                Although war is tragic, I don’t consider this a genocide. Eliminating an ethnic group is clearly not Israel’s intention or motivation. If it were they could have easily done so by now and they haven’t for obvious reasons. I oppose genocide, I don’t oppose self-defense. This is about safety for them.

                • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Eliminating an ethnic group is clearly not Israel’s intention or motivation.

                  https://kbin.social/m/[email protected]/t/588452/Israeli-Government-Mulls-Forcible-Permanent-Transfer-of-2-2-Million-Gaza

                  If Israel wanted to change their position, they’d think seriously about peace. The last administration who did was Rabin’s, and he got assassinated for it.