Serious answers only. For over a year I was told that trump “doesn’t have anything to do with that”.

I honestly need to know from an actual Republican who believed trumps words and is now witnessing p2025 almost hit 50% completion with the department of education getting dismantled.

And with that; how do these people feel that public schools, daycare centers and tech schools all going to cost 3-6x as much as it does now for tuition?

  • Kaboom@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    12 days ago

    I still don’t see them as Trump’s actual plan.

    I’m like one of three conservatives here, do you really expect a response?

      • Kaboom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 days ago

        Trump’s plan is an attempt at putting America’s economy back on track. Protective tariffs, less “aid” to foreign nations, deporting illegal immigrants, not acting like the world’s police when it’s Europe that will be affected most, that sort of thing.

        • badcommandorfilename@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          12 days ago

          Contributions to global organisations is what is known as “soft power” - for example, the only time NATO article 5 has been invoked is by the USA after 9/11

          And guess what - every other country stood up and came to America’s defence. In the grand scheme of things, it’s a pretty good deal to spend a few million for the billions you get back in cooperative agreements with the rest of the world.

        • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          How do you rectify the idea of not being world police with:

          "I have signed a declaration to use emergency authorities to expedite the delivery of approximately $4 billion in military assistance to Israel. "?

          Or is that somehow different?

          • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            12 days ago

            I’ve been trying to crack this and it seems impossible. It’s a black box. You can dismantle every policy by looking at it from a certain standpoint and trying to apply your subjective logic to it. But when Zionist Israel is on the table, all logic goes out the window.

            We can take the presidents one by one:

            Obama - change - doesn’t change anything about relations and policies with Israel

            Biden - staunch defender of Israel. Doesn’t matter what they do, he condemns anything and everything bad, but Israel commits genocide and he doesn’t even acknowledge it.

            Harris - polls showed that she could have gained massive voter support, had she expressed anything in favour of Palestine and acknowledge genocide, but she decided to lose instead for some reason. Proof of what would win her the election wasn’t enough. She could have lost the Zionist campaign funding and still come out ahead.

            Trump - you’d assume he doesn’t care about money because he already has it, doesn’t care about power because he’s literally the president of the most powerful nation. He’s immune to prosecution, so Israel can’t even have something as stupid on him as being a serial child rapist, he’d shrug it off. That stupid Gaza beach resort video. Still doesn’t make sense from fiscal standpoint. He also breaks tradition and protocol on everything.

            There could be better allies in the region, and there have been. But it has to be Israel for some reason, in its current apartheid and genocidal state. My only explanation would be that the Zionist government of Israel and the US government are one and the same on some level, somehow, somewhere.

          • affenlehrer@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            12 days ago

            I think the reasoning is very simple: Israel is extremely important in the Bible. Many conservatives like the Bible so supporting it seems good to them. Especially if it’s against Islam which is associated with immigrants and terror.

    • SolidShake@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      i was hoping for a response yes. and really hoping for an actual intellectual as well.

      so what makes you think it isn’t trumps plan? even though you can follow the progress online of p2025 and trump is checking off each objective.

      what do you see p2025 as? and do you think it will make america “awesome again”

      • Kaboom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        I see Trump’s plan as Trump’s plan. P25 holds some similarities, some things are just that obvious, like illegal immigrants should be deported, but it’s not Trump’s plan. P2025 is it’s own thing, some wishlist created by some think tank that got picked up by the news because it’s so stereotypical.

        I think that Trump’s plan is an attempt to put America back on the right track economically.

        Protective tariffs for instance, are a pretty standard way of protecting domestic industry. It’s expensive to comply with OSHA and labor laws, it’s a lot cheaper to make stuff in China and ship it over here. Tariffs make it so that it’s no longer cheaper. Bernie Sanders agrees, even if can’t directly agree with Trump. https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/sanders-statement-on-trump-tariffs/

        Does p25 have anything on tariffs? No, they don’t.

        P25 does have stuff on things like racial discrimination, which no politician in their right mind would support.

        • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 days ago

          Tariffs are one way to protect domestic industry.

          They are completely useless when that industry does not exist already. When an industry doesn’t exist and you want to build it, you need subsidies, not tariffs.

          Do you believe the US has sufficient industry to protect? Or that we should instead be focused on growing more?

        • SolidShake@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          Republicans already passed the removal of DEIA in the workforce. Idk how you feel about that but that can be seen as racial discrimination which a lot of Republicans have shown don’t give a shit about. A lot are pro white power, women are baby makers. i also can’t see how someone would think p2025 or “trumps plan” as a good thing. I see no benefits to destroying government agencies with no though or plan before hand. How many times has he fired a department only for him to go “woops . We actually needed those people” and then rehire them? 3?.. 4?. Like what’s the point? A lot of Republicans say “we are finding the fraud, so much winning”. How do you feel saying that or hearing it knowing that trump is convicted of 34 felonies? Was on tape gloating how he walked on in naked 15 year old girls and is an actual fraud to the country?

          How do you feel about our administration literally editing the Internet and leaves of history to remove anyone of color or nationality other than white?

          How do you feel about doge finding “wasted tax payer money” but trump plays golf with tax payer money? I’m sorry I just don’t understand and no one has ever answered these questions they just deflect. Like you can’t deny trump is a fucking scum bag monster pedophile