• L3s@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Not going to argue with you about it here, but the short is: if that’s true, when I messaged you, you should have just had a conversation with me about it instead of all of this.

    Have a good one.

          • L3s@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            Not going to argue with you about it here

            This has all been ridiculous.

            Have a good one.

              • Wren@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Rule 5:

                No baiting, sealioning, or promoting an agenda.

                The fact that you’re spamming this in a bunch of community to pick fights perfectly illustrates the violation of this rule.

                So… IMHO- Your post was rightfully removed and done without the irony you’re implying. Despite what you might think, It’s not authoritarian to eject disruptive content.

                • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  Any of these other questions fall under your definition of baiting? In your opinion?

                  Edit: Why not check tenor of any of the many other posts I’ve created and participated in?

                  • Wren@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    I’m not going to argue with you. I’m just pointing out something I felt needed to be said.