in and out of fediverse.
You must log in or register to comment.
World news:
- [email protected] - The Guardian
- [email protected] - Al Jazeera
Climate / environment:
- [email protected] - Inside Climate News
- [email protected] - Mongabay
- [email protected] - Grist
- [email protected] - Planetizen
US News:
- [email protected] - The Guardian US
- [email protected] - BBC US
Tech and tech politics:
- [email protected] - Ars Technica
- [email protected] - 404 Media
- [email protected] - The Register
- [email protected] - Techdirt
US Politics:
- [email protected] - Mother Jones
- [email protected] - Pro Publica
- [email protected] - Good Politics / Political Law Blog
- [email protected] - The Drudge Report (I know! I’m as shocked as anybody. With a good-sized blacklist of crap sources in place, it’s actually pretty informative)
Using this thing right here as an RSS reader! TIL.
[email protected] - Mongabay
An excellent source that I’m ashamed I only discovered recently. Consistently first-rate independent journalism on literally the most important subjects there are. Should be better known. Read. Donate.
Great other choices too.
Rss is the way
I’m usually trusting Reuters or AP news
Though I’ve heard of ground.news and have been thinking about subscribing, DAE have experience with them? Are they as unbiased as they claim?
Reuters usually has half decent articles, but they’re owned by billionaires out of Canada. This look into them was done late last year: https://sh.itjust.works/comment/12174374
AP has some sketch board members as shown here: https://sh.itjust.works/comment/12174861
While Reuters is obviously written from a neoliberal perspective, I think as long as you are aware of that, their coverage is fine. It’s very fact based. It’s designed to provide information for investors who are trying to make money from current events, so they have an incentive to do accurate coverage, but of course they will mainly cover things that are relevant to the finance world.
