• drathvedro@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    …letting an authoritarian state gain more power and influence?..

    That’s one weird argument. Are you implying that meddling with other state’s affairs is justified if it’s to keep it from gaining power and influence?

    • ammonium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s one weird argument. Are you implying morality stops at borders?

      And it’s not even meddling, they are asking for help.

      • drathvedro@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Are you implying morality stops at borders?

        Kind of, yeah. A moral cause in one country can be an evil wrongdoing in other. Case in point - Al-Qaeda was formed because US troops were deployed in some country in the middle east to defend someone.

        And it’s not even meddling, they are asking for help.

        I’m okay with helping Ukraine. I’m not okay if it’s helping only to fuck with Russia.

        • ammonium@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          A moral cause in one country can be an evil wrongdoing in other. Case in point - Al-Qaeda was formed because US troops were deployed in some country in the middle east to defend someone.

          Uhm, where did you get that from?

          Anyway, I get your point, but your example only shows that morality doesn’t really stop at borders for most people.

          I’m okay with helping Ukraine. I’m not okay if it’s helping only to fuck with Russia.

          If it’s to stop an authoritarian state from taking over a democratic state it’s good for me. If it’s because of other less ulterior motives (and let’s not kid ourselves, it’s at least partly because of that), I don’t mind. Is it bad when a doctor only saves lives because it pays well?

          • drathvedro@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Uhm, where did you get that from?

            Actually, I messed up. I thought al-Quaeda was created in response to US’s invasion of Iraq, but it was actually formed a couple years earlier in response to Soviet-Afghan war. Still, the point stands as the guys got very offended by western forces presence on what they considered holy land

            Is it bad when a doctor only saves lives because it pays well?

            It would be very bad if the doctor is some kind of pervert who is only treating patients as a cover up for his obsession

            Anyway, I get your point, but your example only shows that morality doesn’t really stop at borders for most people.

            The point is, morality doesn’t stop, but can be different across (abeit, blurry) cultural, religious, political or ideological lines. The US and allies cross a little more of those than Russia in this conflict, but that’s a topic I’d rather not dive into. What I’m arguing here is against Putin’s rhetoric which tells that “The only thing the collective west wants is to destroy Russia”, so…

            let’s not kid ourselves, it’s at least partly because of that

            I’d advise at least pretending that it’s not and it’s just being “the good guys”. Fuckers like RT, Z-bots and other scum often take such comments and blow them into loudhailers to rally the support for the war. Trust me, “these guys just want to fuck you over” is quite a convincing argument. Besides, there’s plenty of other reasons to support Ukraine

            • crackajack@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Trust me, “these guys just want to fuck you over” is quite a convincing argument. Besides, there’s plenty of other reasons to support Ukraine

              Because Russians are highly nationalistic and have an exceptional sense of…exceptionalism. They have a siege mentality that any outsiders are out to get them (they have been invaded multiple times after all), and that a firm hand ruling them is the only one who could save them from external threats. This leads to the ruling class by easily manipulating the public to support them by stoking nationalism. This stoking of nationalism leads to them craving to carve their own sphere of influence, both avoiding and scapegoating the West.

              There are couple of comprehensive and well detailed video explanation of the Russian mindset, which I think is a blindspot for Westerners in understanding their worldview.

              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8ZqBLcIvw0

              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdFtqa54TuM

              To summarise the videos in two words, basically say the Russians believe their country is “eternal” and “innocent”. This idea stems all the way back from the 19th century with many prominent Russians holding the belief including Leo Tolstoy. This in turn influenced the post-Soviet Russian mindset that is fascistic. Many people cite Dugin as being Putin’s influence, as a matter of fact, it was Ivan Ilyich. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Ilyin?wprov=sfla1

              • drathvedro@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Is that the Kraut I think it is? If so, I don’t think I have enough salt to take with those.

                Anyway, what’s your point?

                • crackajack@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Kraut is a leftist YouTuber, not a politically incorrect username.

                  You could just, you know, read? Point being, the pro-Russian propaganda sounds “convincing” because the Russians are very nationalistic (and also many are too politically apathetic to protest) bunch to be dissuaded from supporting the war. Additionally, many ordinary Russians benefited from the war financially. Here’s another video also putting the war into perspective for many: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebS9h_QSrbI

                  • drathvedro@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Kraut is a leftist YouTuber, not a politically incorrect username

                    I mean whether that’s the “Kraut & Tea” guy. Just looked up - it is. You might want to google on that, too.

                    You could just, you know, read?

                    Did you? I’m saying “don’t give food to propaganda” and you go on rambling about Russian mindset and how nationalistic they are. Even if true (not really), what does it have to do with the argument? The reason “they are out to get ya” is convincing has absolutely nothing to do with nationality or mindset. If someone comes to you with a recording of your neighbor planning on killing you, you will trust that person more than the neighbor, simple as that.

    • crackajack@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s one weird argument to say that supporting a defender, unprovoked, from an aggressor is “meddling”. It’s meddling for your side, amirite?

      • drathvedro@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The reason I’m said this because it sounds like “preventing Russia from prospering is a good cause”, as if we’re still at cold war or something. Probably not what you’ve meant, just pointing at possible confusion in interpretation. Helping a little guy, sure, but helping only to fuck the big guy is what Putin was rambling about in his justifications about war.

        • crackajack@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lol, nowhere between the lines does my comment alludes to “preventing Russia to prosper”. Russia is already prosperous if they want to without having to invade Ukraine. Corruption prevents them from being so.

    • Zetta@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Helping other democracies defeat authoritarian invaders is absolutely worth fucking all of the invaders “affairs”

      • drathvedro@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Helping other X defeat Y invaders is absolutely worth fucking all of the invaders “affairs”"

        Try with different X and Y. See where it gets you.