• Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    “We assume monkeys were unaware of the identity, party affiliation, or policies of any of the candidates,” they wrote.

    I fucking love this.

    • OpenStars@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Some bold assumptions, if you ask me!

      I give the best bananas, people say, nobody in the whole world gives better bananas than me 🍌, and when I give a banana, some assume, I don’t just give a banana, but see they’re coming, their (sic) rapists, and they’re not sending their best people, but when i flush the toilet it doesn’t work quite right and that’s why folks, that’s why when I give this monkey the best banana in the world, that’s why people don’t think it be like that but it do.

  • Kairos@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 months ago

    Literally anything can prefict the election if you count random chance as prediction, yes.

    • OpenStars@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      “That a … 65-year-old votes like a 5-year-old suggests that there is something in our genes that probably drives decisions,”

      Well it suggests something alright. :-|