• crashfrog@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m sure you’ll be willing to share?

    I am sharing it? In every post? I can’t make you read it, though.

    You keep dodging around it but we’re talking about checkpoints inside Gaza preventing aid from being distributed.

    But there are no IDF checkpoints preventing aid from being distributed. The IDF isn’t responsible for the distribution of aid; UNRWA is. And in any case that’s a new accusation; you had previously said they cut off the aid and now you’re saying they get the aid, they just can’t get it to anybody. But the logistical failures of the UNRWA aren’t anyone’s fault but theirs.

    With report after report telling the same story

    But that’s false. There isn’t “report after report” telling the same story. There’s one FRC report, with conclusions all other groups say aren’t supported by their own data, saying that famine has been “severe and imminent” even as Gazans continue to enjoy widespread access to abundant food.

    You literally have nothing else, while I’ve produced source after source.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      So funny story. I’ve gone to every link you’ve provided to me and none of them were a UN study.

      Also a funny story, one link I provided you had multiple IPC reports. So that tells me you aren’t reading my links, and that your claim of “one FRC report” is laughable.

      In the same lane, you also obviously didn’t click though to the news article I provided in the last comment. Or you wouldn’t have said something so demonstrably false about Gazan aid being turned around. Also, again, if you’re going to comment in so many places, re-read the thread real quick to make sure you haven’t forgotten something important. Like the fact that I mentioned that in the last 3 comments. It’s not in fact something new.

      Finally, accusing UNRWA of incompetence while blocking and attacking their aid convoys has been an Israeli propaganda line for most of the past ~10 months. The fact you’ve gone in on that twice now is enough for me to just leave this here. You’re not here in good faith.

      • crashfrog@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’ve gone to every link you’ve provided to me and none of them were a UN study.

        Because you won’t read past the abstract. I can only give you the sources; I can’t make you read them.

        Also a funny story, one link I provided you had multiple IPC reports.

        You didn’t provide a link.

        t. Or you wouldn’t have said something so demonstrably false about Gazan aid being turned around.

        It’s not a news story about aid being turned around in Gaza. It’s a news story about aid being turned around at the Gazan border because it contains impermissible dual-use items that are forbidden in aid shipments to Gaza.

        Finally, accusing UNRWA of incompetence while blocking and attacking their aid convoys has been an Israeli propaganda line for most of the past ~10 months.

        You’re correct that it’s propaganda but you’ve misattributed it. It’s Hamas propaganda.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          If the paper says something the abstract doesn’t then it’s a bad paper or a bad abstract.

          I absolutely provided a link, it’s even labeled, “IPC Report Link”.

          And no. The news article is very clear these checkpoints are inside Gaza, not at the border. Which again is there for you and everyone else to read.

          And lmao you think Hamas is what? Paying the UN to say they’ve been attacked by Israel? You know what don’t answer that. I’m not sure why I even replied to this post since it’s very obvious your only angle here is to deny all evidence of Israel’s crimes. No matter how damning.

          • crashfrog@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            If the paper says something the abstract doesn’t then it’s a bad paper or a bad abstract.

            The whole point of an abstract is that it’s not the entire paper, stupid

              • crashfrog@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                I continue to recommend that you read the paper past the abstract, hope that helps

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  I continue to live in hope you will realize victim blaming the people you blow up isn’t an argument.

                  • crashfrog@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    Does war exist, in your view? Or is it always a case of the winner murdering the loser, unjustifiably?