I’m considering a business plan for people getting in to self-hosting. Essentially I sell you a Mikrotik router and a refurbished tiny x86 server. The idea is that the router plugs in to your home internet and the server into the router. Between the two they get the server able to handle incoming requests so that you can host services on the box and address them from the broader Internet.

The hypothesis is that $150 of equipment to avoid dozens of hours of software configuration is a worthwhile trade for some customers. I realize some people want to learn particular technologies and this is a bad fit for them. I think there are people out there that want the benefit of self-hosting, and may find it worth it to buy “self-hosting in a box”.

What do you think? Would this be a useful product for some people?

  • cygnus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    What’s the value-add over just buying a SFF PC?

  • _bcron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 days ago

    I’m probably an ideal candidate for something like this but I’d much rather have someone walk me through setting my own thing up, rather than them handing me a bunch of preconfigured stuff that leaves me just as clueless.

    If it came bundled around a bunch of DIY guides explaining the hows and the whys, it’d be far more appealling

  • mspencer712@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 days ago

    I think this needs to exist, but as a community supported system, not as a commercial product.

    Pick a set of open technologies - but not the best, lightest weight, just pick something open.

    Come up with a security architecture that’s reasonably safe and only adds a moderate amount of extra annoyance, and build out a really generic “self-hosted web hosting and VM company-like thingy” system people can rally around.

    Biggest threat to this, I think, is that this isn’t the 90s and early 2000s any longer, and for a big project like this, most of the oxygen has been sucked out already by free commercial offerings like Facebook. The technical family friend offering to self-host email or forums or chat no longer gets gratitude and love, they get “why not Facebook?”

    So… small group effort, resistant to bad actors joining the project to kill it, producing a good design with reasonably safe security architecture, that people can install step by step, and have fun using while they build and learn it.

    • BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      We already have that, the first problem is we have like a dozen of them, a few are even well supported. The second problem is that usually the technical knowledge required to set up the systems are still lower than the technical knowledge required to keep it running.

    • whereisk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      I think a possibility is a series of open source anvil or nixos scripts that you can run on most hardware with minimal changes, in an extendable architecture of some kind to add or remove functionality and they perhaps get maintained by the community or some structure of the kind of Linux distributions.

      This could enable people with minimal skills set up and maintain a reasonably useful but secure environment just by changing a few variables.

  • breakingcups@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 days ago

    No. People who want the benefit of self housing without worrying about hardware will rent a vps or something simpler. The hard part of hardware isn’t the purchase, it’s the maintenance.

    Also, why the separate router?

  • JASN_DE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 days ago

    The idea is that the router plugs in to your home internet and the server into the router. Between the two they get the server able to handle incoming requests so that you can host services on the box and address them from the broader Internet.

    Why would I need a separate router for that? I’d need to configure the main router anyway.

    • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      I would absolutely want the extra router because most people have one from their service provider. For self hosting, you want an additional router with your own software.

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    Oooohhhhh boy. Another one of these 🤣

    It’s not like a package thing you can sell if you’re not supporting it. Then you’re just selling hardware at an inflated price. It’s not even self-hosting at that point. Why wouldn’t you just pay a regular company for a product?

    • Handles@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      Was my first impulse too, but looking at their app selection now, it seems kind of … inutile? Unsexy? Old?

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 days ago

    Market to tax funded institutions. If you can market “self hosted” as cheaper and easier than mother solutions you’ll have guaranteed clients for a long time.

  • Riley@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    The tech savvy will just buy a Raspberry Pi and install yunohost on it.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    I probably would. However it has become increasingly obvious that the flaws with solutions so far have been in the organisation. Not so much the particular hardware or software. If I’m going to buy something I’d like some hope that it’ll be there in 5 or 10 or 20 years. So please if you go serious with this, look into worker-owned organizations because I’m tired of dodging profit-maximizing traps and pretend-non-profit landmines. If the people building and supporting the thing aren’t the ones deciding what to do with the revenue and profit, you’re the only one doing it and you’re going to make mistakes that will hurt them and us. And then you become a landmine to dodge.

  • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    The hypothesis is that $150 of equipment to avoid dozens of hours of software configuration

    OK fair try, but you also need to sell me 20-25 TB of disk space on 5 spindles (plus a SSD for the bootdisk), 64 GB RAM (with a chance to go up to 128) and the CPU must have 16 threads or more.

  • SweetMylk@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    What is the aim? People who want to get into it, but does not know how, or experts? Think half of the attraction of selfhosting is the diy aspect.

    What extra would this bring if people can just buy the parts cheaper?

    And for those who only want the out of the box experience why would this be better than, let’s say a beestation? (Yeah price, I know, but you obviously would not have the same support level.)

  • ChillPill@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    I admire the thought of lowering the barrier to entry to start self-hosting for “normies”. Not sure where you are located, but where I am, this price point is not realistic even for used equipment, not including RAM or storage. I’m not really sure what value add you are bringing to the table that one wouldn’t get from just buying used hardware from an office surplus and if one is very inexperienced in self-hostong, looking into something like LTT is partnered with like Hexos.