It seems most instances still use version 0.19.3 and the only one using the up-to-date version is lemmy.ml. They used to update relatively fast. What’s changed?

  • cron@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Given how long it took to fix the federation issues back in december (0.19 update), I’d be hesitant about updating, too.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Given how long it took to fix the federation issues back in december (0.19 update), I’d be hesitant about updating, too.

      But you’re on a 0.19.5 instance. Do you experience issues? There’s some incompatibility with Mastodon, apparently, but given that 0.19.5 addresses serious privacy issues and has been out for a while without big problems, the privacy fixes are more important than keeping 100% Mastodon compatibility. Surely 0.19.6 will be out soon enough to address them.

      • cron@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        At least I personally have not seen any issues in this current release.

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    0.19.4 requires upgrading Postgres (and exporting/importing the database to the new version).

    I just don’t have time for that right now since my Postgres DB is on a dedicated machine and is shared with a few other active services.

    • Nothing4You@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      this isn’t true. it was incorrectly stated in the upgrade guide but has been removed a while ago. it was supposed to be a recommendation due to some issues with postgres 15. there is no postgres upgrade required between 0.19 releases.

      • Kaboom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        The lemmy devs are not exactly industry developers.

        Hell, they don’t even respect gpdr, and one day the EU is going to wreck an instance and maybe an admin too if they didn’t separate liability properly.

      • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Lol, yeah.

        I think they plan to do semvar, but if I recall (and I may be wrong), since it’s pre 1.0.0, they’re “allowed” to make breaking changes since it’s still in alpha.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      is shared with a few other active services.

      Why would you do that, given that Lemmy is 0.x software?

      • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Because I’m not made out of server resources lol. I’ve already got a beefy server that’s dedicated to Postgres and is well tuned, and everything else already hooks into it. I’ve also had better performance (and less overhead) with one, big well-tuned database versus lots of stack-local databases.

        If Lemmy goes tango uniform, then any damage would be limited to its schema. The worst it could really do would be resource starve it, but Zabbix would alert me of that quickly.

        • walden@sub.wetshaving.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          My understanding is that postgres doesn’t need to be upgraded. It’ll still work with version 15 or whatever you have. Postgres 15 has some sort of memory leak that they’re trying to get away from, so they made 16 the new default.

          Same with the “requirement” to upgrade pict-rs to the latest version. You can keep the old version if you don’t care about the new image proxy feature.

          Really it’s a not a problem of needing to upgrade this stuff, but a problem with the documentation which isn’t clear. That’s a big weak spot for the Lemmy project in my opinion. I only learned the above information from lurking a bit in the Matrix chat.

  • poVoq@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    We also upgraded fairly quickly and aside from some annoyances with the new image caching it’s not worse than 0.19.3, so relatively speaking this was a good upgrade.

  • ceiphas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    And Lemmy.ml is managed by one of the devs. And because this instance ist rather self entitled, they don’t care about bugs that much