simple@lemm.eecake to Funny@sh.itjust.works · edit-21 year agoUser returns after 100k-hours ban to continue conversation that got them banned in the first place.www.pcgamer.comexternal-linkmessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up1324arrow-down15file-text
arrow-up1319arrow-down1external-linkUser returns after 100k-hours ban to continue conversation that got them banned in the first place.www.pcgamer.comsimple@lemm.eecake to Funny@sh.itjust.works · edit-21 year agomessage-square30fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareatrielienz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19arrow-down12·1 year agoI admire the dedication. Seems like a waste of time though. The account they were arguing with probably isn’t even still in use. And even if it is, the argument probably isn’t worth it.
minus-squareTwitches@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up58·1 year agoThe article said he’s basically only doing it for comedic purposes. It is funny.
minus-squareBearOfaTime@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up41·1 year agoWaste of time? He put it in his calendar for a reminder 11 years in the future. Spent 5 minutes logging in and typing up his response. Now we all benefit from it!
minus-squareabracaDavid@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoIsn’t all of this just a big waste of time though?
I admire the dedication. Seems like a waste of time though. The account they were arguing with probably isn’t even still in use. And even if it is, the argument probably isn’t worth it.
The article said he’s basically only doing it for comedic purposes. It is funny.
Waste of time?
He put it in his calendar for a reminder 11 years in the future.
Spent 5 minutes logging in and typing up his response.
Now we all benefit from it!
👆
ez win
Isn’t all of this just a big waste of time though?
Probably.