• Ind. center (6)
  • LR conservatives (45)
  • Regionalists (4)
  • No result yet (3)
  • NFP left-wing alliance (181)
  • Macron’s coalition (166)
  • Ind. right (15)
  • RN and allies (143
  • Ind. left (13)
  • Misc. (1)
    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah, and more than once I’ve had someone think “minority government” must just refer to a dictatorship. To be completely fair it is unintuitive that a minority government always holds a majority. So, I just cleared it up right off the bat.

      Two party does indeed suck. We have a somewhat less aggressive version in Canada. IMO the whole world should move towards the Norwegian system, with simple proportional rep and fixed terms to stave off snap elections.

      • Gsus4@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I like the French system. Each constituency is represented by one person who got a majority. In the UK you also get your own representative, but they could win with 20% of the vote if everyone else has less (First Past The Post)…so in the french system you have two rounds to make sure that a majority of people don’t end up represented by someone they despise.

        Proportional representation usually does not give you a representative, you have very little idea who your vote is electing after the first and second candidates…which is annoying when you look down the list and see these interloper nobodies who end up being someone’s cousin that nobody’s ever heard of and has never been seen in public.