I’ve been going through updating all of my accounts (passwords, 2FA, etc.), and I’ve noticed that there are a lot of sites that don’t offer any form of MFA.

I can understand smaller services that might not have the bandwidth, but surely larger organisations are able to get this setup?

  • zorro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    The worst here are financial institutions. What do I want the most security on? My money.

    I get that they have regulations, but it annoys me all the time.

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    its not even about bandwidth… its about cost to implement over the risk to not implement.

    the big big buys have implemented as they helped define the mfa processes we all use. the new, smaller players have implemented because there are easy to implement libraries/services all over (for example, my tiny fediverse instance offers mfa)

    the middle tier just havent gotten around to it, or do not see a direct benefit to doing so.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s also a pain in the ass for the user. Creating a barrier to entry decreases the likelihood that your customers will use the service. I don’t want to go find my phone to receive a text every time I want to log in to every single website.

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Pain in the ass, not really.

        Text based MFA is the least secure option, and shouldn’t be used. Apps or a dedicated hardware token are the options you want, and those are pretty easy to setup.

        That also doesn’t even take into account that mobile makes up more than 50% of global web traffic now. So “going to find your phone”, you are in the minority. The majority of people are already using their phone when they are logging into something.

        A dedicated authenticator app like Authy is easy to set up. And now the most common password managers also allow generating those MFA app codes directly to login with them alongside your regular username and password. Apple’s Keychain, LastPass, and Bitwarden all support it, just to name a few.

        And we have Passkeys being implemented as an alternative to the Password/2FA system, with native support for that via things like iOS and Bitwarden, and I’m sure others as well.

          • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            My second paragraph literally points out that the majority of Internet traffic now is mobile, around 58%. More likely than not, any given person is already on their phone. No need to find your phone when it’s in your hand and you’re already looking at it.

  • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because they don’t feel like it and aren’t required to

    Just copy paste that for literally any “why aren’t more companies doing (X thing that makes sense and better protects the consumer)?” questions.

  • RegalPotoo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago
    • it takes engineering time which is not a trivial cost - accounts and identity for large orgs tend to be a lot more complex than you might think - there will likely be a few different identity stores, and multiple systems that query those stores; making sure every possible permutation works correctly can be a bit undertaking
    • It adds additional load to their support teams which is very expensive

    The support one is a real killer for a lot of places; I’ve worked with a place that had a few million paying customers, and ~half of those were in a tier where a single 30 minute support call would completely negate any revenue that that customer would bring in for the year. Email support was slightly less expensive, but would still be a significant proportion of your annual profit

  • BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    https://2fa.directory A directory of common sites that offer (or don’t offer) 2FA, which and how. I agree it should be a default feature. But maybe harvesting your full ID credentials is more juicy to many companies