Jose Raul Mulino’s election victory in Panama confirms a shift in Latin America economic policies. Disenchanted with years of state intervention in the economy, voters now hope free markets will improve their lives.

Following the recent election victories of pro-business candidates in Argentina and Ecuador, voters in Panama also chose a staunch free-market advocate as their next president in a poll held earlier this month. Jose Raul Mulino, a 64-year-old former security minister in the government, stormed to victory on the campaign slogan “La Promesa de Chen Chen,” meaning “A promise of money in your pocket.”

In November last year, far-right libertarian Javier Milei won the presidency in Argentina, vowing to “exterminate” rampant inflation and “put a chainsaw to the state.” A month earlier, banana fortune heir Daniel Noboa became Ecuador’s youngest president at 35. The Harvard Kennedy School graduate focused his campaign on job creation, recommending tax exemptions and incentives for new businesses and pledging to attract more foreign investment.

What unites all three of these newly elected presidents is the conviction that free enterprise is key to spurring growth in their economically depressed countries. Previous experiments with more socialism-oriented economic policy, modeled on the authoritarian state interventionism of Cuba and Venezuela, only intensified years of economic crisis and led to a mass exodus to the United States.

  • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Lol as an American, good luck with that. You’ll probably have some “good times” in early to mid-stage capitalism. Then, you’ll reach late stage and realize it’s all rigged.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Nah. The tracks are laid already. They’ll go straight to late stage. Turns out the problem was never free market versus heavily regulated. It was always rich people twisting the system.

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah, it’s not like there’s been a good track record in Latin America of socialism being allowed to be implemented. There’s basically 2 countries you could call socialist, and both are sanctioned and under constant threat of regime change.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Well yeah, and that’s the false promise being sold to these people. At least with the economy and national resources under government care there’s a hope to clear out corruption and a certain amount of welfare had to exist to get votes. Once it all goes private it’s going to be ten times worse because there’s no such check on a corporation. They’ll just sell your potatoes right out from under you and bring in foreign troops to enforce it.