Since October 7, more than 3,257 children have been reported killed, including at least 3,195 in Gaza, 33 in the West Bank, and 29 in Israel, according to the Ministries of Health in Gaza and Israel respectively. The number of children reported killed in just three weeks in Gaza is more than the number killed in armed conflict globally – across more than 20 countries – over the course of a whole year, for the last three years.

  • magikarpet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Why should we trust a Ministry of Health in Gaza? Are they not a part of Hamas?

    Edit: they even say later: “Save the Children is an independent, impartial organisation. With the ongoing complete siege of Gaza, journalists and international organisations are not able to get access to Gaza to verify independently and provide updated data on the impact of ongoing bombardment on the civilian population.”

      • magikarpet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        Quotes from the article-

        “Yet the Gaza-based Ministry of Health — an agency in the Hamas-controlled government continues to tally casualty numbers….

        In previous wars, the ministry’s counts have held up to U.N. scrutiny, independent investigations and even Israel’s tallies.

        But an outlier is the ministry’s death toll from an explosion at al-Ahli Hospital in Gaza City last week.”

        So while they have been trustworthy im the past, i still would prefer some third-party oversight after that hospital story. They threw their credibility and caught a bunch of news orgs with their pants down for trusting them.

        • TinyPizza@kbin.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Here, you forgot the rest of the quote

          Yet the Gaza-based Ministry of Health — an agency in the Hamas-controlled government — continues to tally casualty numbers. It released its first detailed report on the casualties Thursday, giving names, ID numbers, ages and gender for Palestinians it says have been killed. The total toll is 7,028 Palestinians, including 2,913 minors, according to the ministry.
          The ministry is the only official source for Gaza casualties. Israel has sealed Gaza’s borders, barring foreign journalists and humanitarian workers. The AP is among a small number of international news organizations with teams in Gaza. While those journalists cannot do a comprehensive count, they’ve viewed large numbers of bodies at the sites of airstrikes, morgues and funerals.

          The AP wrote the article for anyone who cares to look. There’s genuinely a lot to learn about in there.

          • magikarpet@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            I was addressing the previous statement saying the ministry was not a part of Hamas when their own article clearly states -an agency in the Hamas-controlled government-

            The article also said that their data was wrong in a story everyone remembers a week ago with the hospital.

            Obviously a lot of people are being killed, I am not saying they aren’t. But accurate sources are important.

              • magikarpet@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                1 year ago

                We can keep quoting the whole article.

                Is relation to the hospital explosion:

                “U.S. President Joe Biden said he had “no confidence” in the accuracy of the ministry’s reporting. However, the U.S. government’s annual human rights assessments from the region frequently cite the Gaza ministry.

                Gaza’s Health Ministry stands by the 471 figure and includes it in the total death toll. When asked about conflicting accounts, authorities emphasize the difficulties of their work and vigorously deny any fabrication”

                My takeaway is, they have been accurate historically and are used internationally, but they should be verified, especially after recent events.

    • TinyPizza@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wouldn’t a good way to stop that be to stop the bombardment and let in people to take a full accurate tally? Israel would stop to do that if they cared about that number, and yet the bombs keep dropping.

      • magikarpet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, that street goes 2 ways. Hamas could also release the hostages and surrender. That would also end the bombardment and let in people to take a tally.

        • TinyPizza@kbin.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Good point. Why are they bombing the place where the hostages are? That seems like they also don’t care about the hostages. Are the hostages Palestinian?

          • magikarpet@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            19
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nope, the hostages are from all over the world because Hamas targeted civilians at a music festival.

            Unlike IDF who are targeting war assets that are conveniently located beneath schools, mosques, hospitals, and apartments.

            Which is why i dont trust Gaza data. They want civilians to die to spread propaganda against Israel so people like you can have talking points.

              • magikarpet@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                15
                ·
                1 year ago

                Sorry, that was rude of me to say.

                I mean people that would use that data/story to make Israel look like the aggressor and Palestine the victim, when it is not that black & white.

                I don’t want kids on any side to die, but using kids as a shield to hide behind is really shitty. So while i want kids to be safe, my anger is directed at Hamas for using them. Not Israel for fighting a group that massacred it’s people 3 weeks ago.

                • TinyPizza@kbin.socialOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  14
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  you don’t believe, under the context of thousands of dead kids, there’s any right way to perceive Palestine as the victim? There were less kids killed in the Oct 7 attack than there have been since in the West Bank, and they didn’t do anything to deserve that. Did they? This all just sounds like collective punishment to me.

                  Collective punishment is a war crime prohibited by treaty in both international and non-international armed conflicts, more specifically Common Article 33 of the Geneva Conventions and Article 6 of the Additional Protocol II.

                  • magikarpet@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    arrow-down
                    14
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Hamas is also committing countless warcrimes.

                    “1. In order to ensure respect for and protection of the civilian population and civilian objects, the Parties to the conflict shall at all times distinguish between the civilian population and combatants and between civilian objects and military objectives and accordingly shall direct their operations only against military objectives…

                    1. The taking of hostages is prohibited. Common Article 3; GC IV, Article 34.
                    2. The prohibition against taking hostages in armed conflict is a fundamental guarantee whose breach is a war crime.”

                    Meanwhile the International Humanitarian Law clearly states:

                    “ 1. The presence or movements of the civilian population or individual civilians shall not be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operations, in particular in attempts to shield military objectives from attacks or to shield, favour or impede military operations. The Parties to the conflict shall not direct the movement of the civilian population or individual civilians in order to attempt to shield military objectives from attacks or to shield military operations.

                    1. Under no circumstances shall medical units be used in an attempt to shield military objectives from attack. Whenever possible, the Parties to the conflict shall ensure that medical units are so sited that attacks against military objectives do not imperil their safety.
            • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Have you considered that they have tunnels and shelters under these buildings because they have been bombed by the IDF for decades? Have you seen even a single shred of verification of the military nature of these targets, like munitions, weapons or anything of the sort?

              • Mchugho@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s still morally reprehensible to use civilians as air raid shelters. Completely against the Geneva convention.

                • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  What I’m saying is they have shelters in residential areas because they are bombed in civilian areas by the IDF, so they need shelters everywhere. It’s not civilians as air raid shelters, the civilians are everywhere and they are bombed everywhere, there are too many people and too little space for there to be a large distinct separation between the military and civilians in Palestine. The militants are the civilians because there is popular resistance against Israel from Palestine.

                  • Mchugho@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I understand this but it’s still reprehensible to do so and leaves Israel with very little choice other than to go in on the ground, or just accept the threat of terrorism permanently. There is a reason Israel gives a lot of warning for their strikes. I do genuinely think they are under very real pressure from allies to reduce civilian casualties.

                    Maybe if the civilians are actually militants then Hamas should stop counting them as civilian casualties?