Foreign secretary’s call comes after group releases video of British-Israeli hostage it says died after being wounded in Israeli airstrike

David Cameron has urged the BBC to describe Hamas as a terrorist organisation, reviving an accusation that the corporation shies away from a valid description of the Islamist group that is holding Israeli hostages.

The UK foreign secretary told the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg that the organisation should reconsider its guidelines in light of a video released by Hamas showing the British-Israeli hostage Nadav Popplewell, who the group said had died in Gaza.

Hamas released a statement on Saturday saying the 51-year-old had died after being wounded in an Israeli airstrike a month ago. The video showed him with a black eye.

  • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Wow. Believe whatever you want - don’t let facts get in the way of your opinions. You are so colossally misunderstanding what the phrase “government approved regulator” means. Thanks for the laugh.

    • Murvel@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      They’re regulated, you for some reason don’t belevie they are, that’s it, not sure what else to add.

      • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m not questioning that they’re regulated and never have - you absolute ham sandwich. I’m correcting you in your mistaken belief that the regulator is the government. Ofcom is not the government - regardless of what you want to believe. It doesn’t matter how loud you shout - you’re wrong when you say the BBC is regulated by the government. It is regulated by Ofcom. Please do some research.

          • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            You definitely need to work on your reading comprehension… but try the bit further down your quoted article where it says that Ofcom is a “statutory corporation”. And then read the article on that phrase. Still convinced Transport For London is a government agency? Hell, with your (incorrect) argument that would make the actual BBC a government agency as it itself is a statutory corporation. So why would the government need Ofcom? Hmmmm

            • Murvel@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              It says it a government agency on the wikipedia page, in the summary no less! Are you really this petty, my god dude!

              • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                To quote your own source again: “…government-approved regulatory and competition authority…” If you think that is synonymous with being a part of the UK government then that is on you and no amount of help will change that. On a side note - are you interested in replacing Ofcom with an industry approved regulator instead?

                  • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    The irony of that comment has really tickled me. Thanks internet stranger. Best of luck to you for the future. Good bye. 👋

          • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            The Office of Communications, commonly known as Ofcom, is the government-approved regulatory and competition authority for the broadcasting… looks like it says government-approved to me. That’s different to being a part of the government.