• stonedemoman@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    That is what I’m asserting I am stating it as fact that is objective.

    You’ve already made your opinion clear.

    Aside from your own personal anecdotal opinion about how much you found the movie to be easy to follow do you have anything to refute my statement?

    Already been over this in another comment where I explained why I thought Nolan’s use of these devices fit for Oppenheimer, this “conversation” was over a while ago. And best of all, Oppenheimer won an academy award for best director, best adapted screenplay, best editing- basically any criteria associated with your “critiques”. You don’t have to take my word for it, you can defer to much better film critics than either of us.

    Please look up the definitions to the $10 words you’re using in your $1 sentences.

    Cute.

    • mechoman444@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      And best of all, Oppenheimer won an academy award for best director, best adapted screenplay, best editing- basically any criteria associated with your “critiques”. You don’t have to take my word for it, you can defer to much better film critics than either of us.

      And Obama won a nobel Peace prize while bombing several Middle Eastern countries.

      What the Academy Awards do is beyond useless. They can be disregarded completely as though they don’t exist.

      Moreover, Oppenheimer is the kind of derivative schlock most modern film critics will praise because they got their masters in Spanish literature and they think they know what a good storry is.