• nonailsleft@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    8 months ago

    Above, you arrive at the suggestion that if the IDF was firing off warning shots, this could have set off a panic/stampede through the crowd and the trucks driving. but this would still mean that the IDF was largely responsible through this chain of events. Which I certainly agree with.

    But the article says something completely different. It suggests the IDF waited for these victims to gather around the aid trucks and says they then opened fire on them. With artillery, drone missiles and gunfire. It mentions nothing about people being trampled or run over by trucks.

    You don’t see a little bit of contradiction there?

    • underisk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      My dude I’m not arriving at any conclusion about what specifically happened. I saying even the most favorable interpretation toward Israel is damning. It doesn’t matter when or how they shot into the crowd, the only reason a starving crowd on the edge of panic existed in the first place is because Israel created it. That, for me, is enough to lay all the deaths at their feet regardless of whether they were shot, trampled, or run over.

      If you’re concerned that I might be taking Israel at their word for some reason, let me assure you: I do not buy their version of events for even a second.