• Tangent5280@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    Jordan not taking responsibility for the base on their land is how you know some shady ass black site shit is going on there - it’s a convenient way to reduce liability in case it ever comes out.

    Syria being a near failed state seems like a good scapegoat to pin shit like this on.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      10 months ago

      Or they just don’t want to get dragged into a larger conflict. “Jordan? Nah, nah, nah, it ain’t LIKE that… that’s SYRIA!”

      • Tangent5280@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        This makes more sense, considering what a hotbed that entire region is. But wouldn’t this cause issues if Syria later claims that the base is actually on their land and redraes borders or something?

        • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Oh, definitely, but I don’t think Syria is all that organized at this point. Jordan’s probably counting on that.

    • BigPotato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Tower 22 is more like a rear det for Al Tanf. It’s a way to project force into Syria without actually going in and leaving the SDF to work the Syrian side, with the implication that Syria might attack the SDF base but not risk attacking Jordan. There are bases in Jordan, well, not bases like Germany or Kuwait but diplomatic compounds with every thing that comes with that.

      It’s not a black site though, they’ve posted pictures a few years back when a Syrian drone wrecked a few buildings.