@[email protected] to World [email protected]English • 8 months agoUN report says world is racing to well past warming limit as carbon emissions rise instead of plungeenglish.elpais.comexternal-linkmessage-square186fedilinkarrow-up1595arrow-down15
arrow-up1590arrow-down1external-linkUN report says world is racing to well past warming limit as carbon emissions rise instead of plungeenglish.elpais.com@[email protected] to World [email protected]English • 8 months agomessage-square186fedilink
On Friday, the globe hit 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees) above pre-industrial levels for the first time in recorded history
minus-squareF_HaxhausenlinkfedilinkEnglish6•8 months agoNo it is not. Eugenics is an attempt to improve the genetic quality of a human population. We are talking about an attempt to stop climate change. We are not trying to “improve” the genetics of human population.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-28 months agoEugenics sounds good at first, but human greed and corruption makes it an incredibly dangerous tool that should probably not be in the hands of anyone
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•8 months agoI’ve heard too many people (mostly elderly) speak out for it. It’s definitely a bad idea
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-3•8 months ago We are talking about an attempt to stop climate change those are the trappings, but the method is bare eugenics
minus-squareF_HaxhausenlinkfedilinkEnglish6•8 months agoNo it is not. Eugenics is a pseudo-science about improvement of genetics. Period. Trying to avoid climate catastrophe is not about improving genetics.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•8 months ago Eugenics is a pseudo-science about improvement of genetics. Period no, it’s not, even the wikipedia article we both love disputes this claim plainly.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-1•8 months ago Trying to avoid climate catastrophe is not about improving genetics. if the method by which you try to avoid it is eugenicist, then it is.
minus-squareF_HaxhausenlinkfedilinkEnglish1•8 months agoI’m done. I am not into bickering for no reason.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-1•8 months agoi didn’t ask you to say anything in the first place.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-3•8 months agothat’s a narrow definition that doesn’t really encompass all the ways in which eugenics has been practiced. frequently, as i have done here, it is used synonymously with genocide. stop practicing genocide.
minus-squareF_HaxhausenlinkfedilinkEnglish4•8 months agoNo. Genocide is murdering people. Genocide is violence against people. Forcing people, against their will to stop existing. Asking people to reproduce less is asking people (not forcing them) to exercise their own will.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•8 months agogenocide is also propaganda that encourages one segment of the population to cease reproduction.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•8 months agothat is true, but eugenics is something very different
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•8 months agoin this case, it’s a synonymous use. they are totally equivalent in this respect.
No it is not. Eugenics is an attempt to improve the genetic quality of a human population.
We are talking about an attempt to stop climate change. We are not trying to “improve” the genetics of human population.
Eugenics sounds good at first, but human greed and corruption makes it an incredibly dangerous tool that should probably not be in the hands of anyone
I don’t think eugenics sounds good.
I’ve heard too many people (mostly elderly) speak out for it. It’s definitely a bad idea
those are the trappings, but the method is bare eugenics
No it is not. Eugenics is a pseudo-science about improvement of genetics. Period.
Trying to avoid climate catastrophe is not about improving genetics.
no, it’s not, even the wikipedia article we both love disputes this claim plainly.
if the method by which you try to avoid it is eugenicist, then it is.
I’m done.
I am not into bickering for no reason.
i didn’t ask you to say anything in the first place.
that’s a narrow definition that doesn’t really encompass all the ways in which eugenics has been practiced. frequently, as i have done here, it is used synonymously with genocide. stop practicing genocide.
No. Genocide is murdering people. Genocide is violence against people. Forcing people, against their will to stop existing.
Asking people to reproduce less is asking people (not forcing them) to exercise their own will.
genocide is also propaganda that encourages one segment of the population to cease reproduction.
that is true, but eugenics is something very different
in this case, it’s a synonymous use. they are totally equivalent in this respect.