I don’t get it.

Aw, too bad, they were working so hard on bankrupting themselves in defiance of that endless money cheat code they’ve got…

Also, the CIA panel is missing the part where they overthrew a small country in the process.

Last part is highly topical again…

If you need to “discharge”, just go the toilet, okay?

Are sov-cits now also opposed to the word “me”?

Gold was never a widespread means of payment for the common people. It is way too rare for that to even be a practical possibility. Aristocracy, kings and emperors may have occasionally done this, but only for major things and matters of state, or sometimes when they wanted to impress someone. Also, a bit later, banks of course held on to a lot of gold and long distance traders used it, because they couldn’t rely on either their customary set of values nor on credit from the locals.

Silver, for obvious reasons, was more widespread, but still far from universal.

The common people would pay for things with stuff that both parties agreed was worth a certain amount of gold or silver (prices were a lot more rigid back then), possibly other metals, but quite possibly just IOUs or other forms of credit. In a tightly knit rural community where everybody know everybody else, and neighbors would assume to stay neighbors for their whole lives, that actually worked. In a modern suburb where knowing your next-door neighbor’s name is more a matter of maybe-if-you’re-feeling-polite, not so much.

It is true, however, that the US government at some point confiscated gold from private citizens and outlawed private ownership of gold. Once in 1933, and then arguably once more in 1971.

Too much US-specific legalese in this one for me to even properly parse. Without the title, I wouldn’t even have guessed that this would be a sovereign citizen style post. I have no clue what a UCC-1, an AAA, NFCU, or a 1099 form is. I also have no clue how her car being repossessed leads to something being discharged as bad debt on her end. Thorougly lost here.

Well passwordless.

Same thing in this context. But sure, an encrypted partition would work.

Dunno about ideal, but it should work.

It does have quite a bit of overhead, meaning it’s not the fastest out there, but as long as it’s fast enough to serve the media you need, that shouldn’t matter.

Also, you need to either mount it manually on the command line whenever you need it or be comfortable with leaving your SSH private key in your media server unencrypted. Since you are already concerned with needing to encrypt file share access even in the local network, the latter might not be a good option to you.

The good part about it is, as long as you can ssh from your media server to your NAS, this should just work with no additional setup needed.

Interesting. Though it does seem to to require your private key to be unencrypted…

Is sshfs an option? Unfortunately, I don’t think you can put that into /etc/fstab, though…

Wait, they managed to forge Let’s Encrypt certificates? While it explains the attack on TLS (though technically not https as originally claimed, not that it makes much of a difference), that’s even worse…

Really? That’s a rather big claim, and would change a lot for me if true. Do you have anything by the way of a source?

Also, how do you MITM https traffic without one of the parties just handing you their keys?

In your case, instead of getting a dedicated server and putting proxmox on it, I would check if it might not be cheaper to just get individual virtual servers directly.

Other than that, sure, I have been a customer for many years now, and I have always been a fan of Hetzner’s price to quality ratio.

Too bad this windows firewall dialog is really sparse on details. We really have no way have telling whether that is normal permissions or not.

I’ve read that article. It is complete garbage and doesn’t explain anything at all. It’s just standard cookie cutter fear mongering to sell some random antivirus software.

In theory, that shouldn’t even be possible with JavaScript. There’s such a thing as same-origin policy for that exact reason…

deleted by creator

That’s all? Hard to believe, he says piracy out loud several times and even has the word in the video title…