halyk.the.red

Did anyone else have a ton of trouble making sense of the headline? Granted, I’m not exactly sober right now, but that seems confusing.

I dunno, I think Argonians would encourage negative talk about swamps to discourage travellers to their bog, not unlike Shrek or New Jersey.

The starliner is to return unmanned, according to this article. Can you imagine being on the ISS, and watching the ship you should have taken shred apart into burning rain as it attempts to pierce the veil of our atmosphere.

It’s just taking a nap.

Absolutely. I agree that life would be so much simpler if it was only black and white issues, but rarely is that the case. And I get it, those binary beliefs are comfortable. But we need to endure the difficulty of questioning our assumptions, pushing out of that simplistic worldview, and learning. It’s the only way we grow as people.

It seems that way. I only addressed the article, and some of them were talking as if I was advocating death penalties for people expressing themselves.

Sensationalist headline, trading journalistic integrity for website clicks. But I suppose “shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years” doesn’t draw as much attention.

That’s what my first thoughts were as well, but they were flying in some pretty nasty weather. Thick fog, high winds, in a remote forested mountain range. While it is entirely possible that the CIA and IDF may have collaborated on some impromptu helicopter modifications, I think the question is less “Who could have done this?” and is more “Why were they flying in those conditions?”

I’m sure there’s someone out there who is jealous of this man’s thick and meaty earlobes.

If I’m not mistaken, it’s just to say where the dog has been.

As far as pee ownership goes, if you can get to the pee first, it’s yours. You should probably ask the owner first if it’s not a stray.