• 0 Posts
  • 25 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: November 21st, 2023

help-circle
  • I’m not entirely sure how “… don’t need anything near as memory efficient as Alpine” became “Debian is obviously superior to Alpine”.

    … I was referencing systemd and familiarity of use in regard to OP. Debian just happened to be mentioned, it comes per default with systemd, and it’s my personal first choice for servers. Though, taking context into account, OP did say they originally came from Ubuntu and made it sound like they were trying to optimize their system since it “only” had 4(8)GB memory in total.

    I do believe Debian with systemd is more similar to Ubuntu than Alpine is to Ubuntu. My point was not so much about Debian vs Alpine in general as it was specific to efficiency in regard to memory usage, with the sole reason to change to Alpine over Debian (or any OS which uses systemd, really) purely for memory savings being rather weak when systemd only uses some <50MB in memory, the computer has 4GB+ of it, and the user already is familiar with Debian-based flavors which use systemd.

    So no, Debian is obviously not “obviously superior to Alpine”, just as systemd isn’t too heavy to run on computers with 4GB of RAM - unless you’re trying to push the computer to its limits.


  • Huh? I don’t think you need anything near as memory efficient as Alpine for something which has 4GB of RAM, unless you’re doing it for the sole purpose of pushing the machine and yourself to the limit.

    I only ever consider dropping Debian and/or Systemd when going below 512MB RAM. I’ve run most of my public-facing homelab stuff on a 1GB VPS till recently, including multiple webservers such as FoundryVTT, and Docker containers such as a Wireguard server, Jenkins, Searxng, etc… It rarely used more than ~60% of the RAM, but I obviously couldn’t run Immich or any heavy services on it.







  • Ideally, a .mp4, or any other non-executable file format, would not be able to execute rogue code on your computer, but the programs you use to open the files with might have security flaws which allow rogue code execution if done right.

    You might have a hypothetical file, which might not be dangerous if opened with VLC, but which exploits a flaw in, say, Windows Media Player version x.y.z to execute a payload.

    Sorry, for not including any examples, I’m currently not at the PC.




  • To expand a little:

    While it indeed is annoying, it did mostly go as expected, as in, law makers must always be ready for companies responding to new and more restrictive laws with malicious compliance.

    The vast majority of websites don’t actually follow the rules for cookie banners or implement them in as roundabout a way as possible, making them needlessly annoying as it should always be easier and at least as fast to decline than to accept.

    While this all sounds like cookie banners ultimately are a failure because of the misimplementations that companies provided in response, it does function as an eye opener for the common man and stepping stone for the EU for further laws and fines in regard to citizens’ rights to privacy.



  • People who rely too heavily on autocorrect do already now cause misunderstandings by writing something they did not intend to.

    I had a friend during uni who was dyslectic, and while the words in his messages were written proper you still had to guess the context from the randomly thrown together words he presented you with.

    Now that we can correct not only a single word or roughly the structure of a sentence, but instead fabricate whole paragraphs and articles by providing a single sentence, I imagine we will see a stark increase in low-quality content, accidental false information, and easily preventable misunderstandings - More than we already have.




  • Haven’t heard about that one, thank you for the heads-up.

    First impressions:

    • From top 10 artists i follow:
      • 5/10 have profile and uploaded at least one song on Bandcamp.
      • 3/10 have an account on Audius (possibility to donate).
      • 1/10 has uploaded at least one song on Audius.
    • One MUST upload a profile picture to create an account.
      • About 1/3 of proposed artists during account creation have uploaded <5 songs, most seem to be remix and cover artists.
      • Didn’t figure out how to search for artists during account creation, ended up choosing 2/3 artists I’ve never heard of.
    • Not immediately apparent whether I can download bought music to a lossless format.
    • Not sure how to buy album or individual song at first glance.
    • LOTS of remixes and covers, not so much original songs (this is both good and bad).
    • Nice that you can donate arbitrary amount without buying anything, in case you already got the music from… other places…
      • I didn’t find anyplace where “$AUDIO” is explained, how much the artist receives, or what you receive if anything.

    Less relevant observations:

    • weird pause/play button, sometimes there’s just a loading wheel spinning where it’s supposed to be, not really functional.
    • Slightly intrusive, had to disable some plugins (Javascript (obviously it’s playing music) and fingerprinting (cloudflare?)) for the site to load. Not relevant to music, but just a general observation since we’re in the piracy community.

    Not much going on by now, but it probably just needs some time to grow and assimilate the likely soon-to-be-migrating Bandcamp user base. I’ll keep an eye on it, and probably revisit it once more artists have migrated to it.