And heat, a lot of heat. 4th time dead

I am not religious, but you are right. He has been very vocal on this. People like to choose what is convenient for them

Just to temporarily keep people waiting to be transferred to Italy

There are no jails in Vatican city. Prisoners are held in Italian jails. But this guy will likely do zero time in jail. Too old

He’s old. Most likely he won’t do real prison time, just “home” prison (I don’t know the English word). Anyway, regarding your questions, most likely yes… With the exception of alcohol, that is allowed only on special events. Also, in theory a medical doctor (nutritionist) has to approve the meals. In practice I don’t know, I’ve never been in jail.

You see, this is a good thing. Different red flags save different people from incompatible partners.

Red flag for me: if a partner judges hobbies based on some arbitrary definition of “creativity”. It is usually red flag for snobby partners.

Gardening or gaming are as good as painting

AI won’t do psychology redundant. Might allow for an easier and broader access to low level psychological first support.

What is more likely to make psychological consultants a risky investment is the economic crisis. People are already prioritizing food over psychological therapy. Psychological therapy unfortunately is nowadays a “luxury item”.

Stable diffusion + controlnet.

Check stable diffusion community here or on reddit.

No probs :)

It was just to give an idea that what OP mentioned is already an established thing, fairer than alternatives.

Most of the time trivial linear logistic regression is used in this context. Nowadays decision tree ensambles are pretty heavily used, which are ML. Simply they perform better with fewer data than neural networks on structured tabular data.

What you refer to as AI is probably methods based on deep learning. The truth is that they work exactly as any other algorithm that you are referring to. They are used for regression and classification, same way as a standard linear regression. The difference is that the models are non linear, and their complexity is so that a lot of data are needed to train them.

But conceptually one can absolutely create a credit score with deep neural networks. It is just an overkill, for performances that are likely worst than a random forest on relatively small training datasets

Neural networks-based methods are indeed used in fraud detection

I live in a place where I don’t need credit score, luckily…

Are we from the same country? Debt is something I don’t understand unless for a home or a car. If I have money to buy a tv, I pay in advance, or I wait until I have the money. I am not judging different points of view, just this is how I was raised

You know there are people in bank and credit institutions that have been doing this for centuries? Probably millennia… EU explicitly requires that some of this is done by what you call AI (i.e. mathematical models) because they are fairer than humans and safer for customers and society

Check basel III for an intro on the topic

They set zscaler so that if I don’t access an internal service for an unknown number of months, it means I don’t need it “for my daily work”, so they block it. If I want to access it again I need to open a ticket. There is no way to know what they closed and when they’ll close something.

In 1 months since this policy is active, I already have opened tickets to access test databases, k8s control plane, quality control dashboard, tableau server…

I really cannot comment how wrong it is.

I guess nobody knows. It also really depends on the program installed. If you need all qt, gdk, jdk, java for each program with a ui… You’d run out of space soon

I don’t put wsj as reputable. I meant that even a journal considered reputable as wsj has been found publishing fake news in the past. That’s why I say that I am pro filtering all Murdoch’s media

Edit. I added an adjective in the original comment to make it clearer

The real challenge is “how do users can judge what is a fake news?”. In a similar situation it is an extremely difficult task even for newspapers with journalists on the field. See what’s happening with the blame-shifting on the bombing of Gaza’s hospital.

Even guardian and bbc have trouble understanding where is the truth.

A solution could be filtering the sources (for instance, no unknown blogs, or the sun and fox News, only reputable sources such as guardian and bbc). But important real news might be missed in this case, that are direct testimony of journalists on the field. And supposedly reputable sources such as wsj or similar are also known to have shared fake news, particularly when it comes to this conflict. And also reputable sources are biases.

It is an extremely difficult topic. No one has a definitive answer unfortunately.

I would be in favor of filtering at least the widely known sources of fake news (shady blogs, all Murdock’s media and so on)

Edit. An adjective to clarify

Because in many languages that are not English, America is the whole continent. What Americans call “America” is United States of America. We need a word for their citizens, that is not the name of the inhabitants of the whole continent

In Italian “statunitensi”, i.e. United States people