I used to get this when i was younger, it was tied to my mental anxiety of having to sit still 7 hours. I hated it. 1 hour into the flight my legs would be in pain. The kind of pain you get when a pet or whatever is on your legs and you can’t move but you want to, even if it hasn’t been very long.

After flying a lot in my life I managed to accept my fate, and that helped a lot. It starts happening on the last hour of the flight, or if we’re stuck on the tarmac too long.

The bird will never land on your ship if you constantly stand guard to catch it; instead improve your ship and sail into warmer waters, the bird will land while you are not looking.

-cgp grey

The U.S is the primary supporter, and they dont acknowledge courts “they are not party of”. Bush removed the US in 2002.

This is good for the rest of world, and for posterity, but it’s not going to have an immediate impact. The main supporter of isreal doesn’t recognize the court.

I read this a decade ago on reddit. It’s one of the only conspiracy theories that I actually think isn’t so crazy.

That’s the neat part, you don’t!

The joke is that even if Ukraine would agree, it’s just a trick to gain more land and do it again.

Comma horror

An aide said they would agree, nothing has been done yet, and the conditions are not clear.

For all we know this is israel preparing to blame an aid for a misunderstanding, while they keep killing Palestinians and Biden gets to look good in the media.

And they will gladly gaslight everyone that “they never even answered and had to send a repo man to hide the truth! It’s all rigged for Big Repo”.

There’s no winning with logic.

Study these codes written by the government, they give you rights; not those codes written by the government, they don’t give you any rights.

I saved 50k on my house because some private company was hired to do an inspection and they noted a 40 page report with all sorts of shit that wasn’t really important.

Nobody wanted to buy it after that. Luckily I build houses so I know what to look for and cut him a deal to get rid of it. Aside from having an electrician come in to double check all the aluminum wiring connections (and making plans to replace the aluminium wires), not one thing in those 40 pages should have affected the price of the house.

Depends on where you live.

The bank will often send an inspector for a loan, but it’s literally him just walking around and validating there is a house and it’s not in shambles. He’ll look at things like the roof from the outside and when it was redone, but isn’t going to hop into your crawlspace to look for signs of water damage.

Then you have the “private” inspection company that you can pay to check your home for yourself. These companies are know to cost a lot of money, often detailing things they can’t be sure are “risks”. They’ll go in the crawlspace and note all sorts of things.

On my house the expensive private inspection said “the roof here is kinda saggin and there’s a bump there, it could be anything”. In the same report he accidentally shows a picture from under the roof where you can see there was a repair and some extra framing, causing the small “bump” that is purely aesthetic. Didn’t mention that part.

Getting someone to look at it post purchase is likely going to be much cheaper, and I’m definitely not recommending people don’t get inspections when buying houses if they don’t know what they’re doing.

It’s not to save from embarrassment, it’s overdraft protection as a service on the account, and it’s expensive. If you don’t have overdraft protection it will just decline instead.

Surprised pikachu…

It’s not weird because of that. The bot could have easily explained it can’t answer legally, it didn’t need to say: sorry gotta end this k bye

This is probably a trigger on preventing it from mixing in laws of AI or something, but people would expect it can discuss these things instead of shutting down so it doesn’t get played. Saying the AI acted as a lawyer is a pretty weak argument to blame copilot.

Edit: no idea who is downvoting this but this isn’t controversial. This is specifically why you can inject prompts into data fed into any GPT and why they are very careful with how they structure information in the model to make rules. Right now copilot will give technically legal advice with a disclaimer, there’s no reason it wouldn’t do that only on that question if it was about legal advice or laws.

Yeah they should have never been allowed to search there in the first place.

Essentially , but that wouldn’t be totally correct, youre framing it that way to make a strawman. The definition is:

Social media websites and applications that enable users to create and share content or to participate in social networking.

So written words, shared on a platform made to exchange words and images publicly for others to discuss/comment on, if you really don’t want to use the dictionary.

So now i’m “throwing a tantrum” because saying I was inventing definitions (from the dictionary) didn’t work. Seems like youre the one throwing a tantrum because you were wrong. My argument is fine and far from pedantic. Saying “news and links” aren’t “media” is what’s pedantic

Yeah that’s a badly written sentence. “Most post for other social circles to see their media when they create content”.

Doesn’t change the arguments that this is social media. Lemmings and reditors just like to feel special

Ah yes, the arbitrary definitions of the dictionary are my opinion. Well formed argument