• 2 Posts
  • 35 Comments
Joined 9 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 17th, 2024

help-circle







  • Yeah, I do have trouble sometimes when it comes to those accused of sexual crimes… Cosby is especially difficult because he portrayed himself as a role model to such a degree. Can’t really do Allen, either, but he was never my type of filmmaker. They both just come off as hideous hypocrites and gross in their products now. I can’t even bring myself to call their doings art anymore, really. But they made themselves the center of the work in many cases, so it is more difficult to ignore than what some rock bands have gotten up to. I know Page and Plant did some fucked up things, and thus I dislike them, but I can’t not listen to the music they created. It’s too fundamental to me.


  • Flummoxed@lemmy.worldOPtoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.worldCassavetes?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Appreciate that perspective: it really does boil down to art vs. artist. I tend to err toward keeping the bathwater and throwing the baby out.

    The artist can be speratated from the work and the work can be appreciated without understanding the author’s intent.

    But is there a line where the artist overshadows the art? Is that based on our personal morals?

    Edit: I know my adjectives vs. adverbs, really!





  • Oh, I use “is,” “was,” and other “to be” verbs often in speech and even in writing, though I do try to find ways around it simply because I prefer to use more precise language. A “to be” verb is basically an equals sign, i.e. “The job is terrible” could be roughly expressed as “The job = terrible.” While that construction is fine and tells the reader something, it would be better to be more specific because what is usually meant is something more nuanced: “The job has me walking around too much, which hurts my legs.”