

It was tongue-in-cheek, along with “unfortunately”
It was tongue-in-cheek, along with “unfortunately”
I’m pretty sure I only said it was wrong.
Not only is “common” unfortunately not a quantitative assertion (and I disagree), many incorrect usages are “common.”
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Head_shake
As earlier stated, obviously some people might use the opposite words for a particular effect.
It’s just not the accepted and used English for those actions. If it was something like “rotated” then it would be ambiguous and subject to interpretation, but the word “shook” already has a meaning
And their point is that they are wrong to do so.
We already went over it, I hit him so no refunds
autististic
Repeating patterns, checks out
I haven’t encountered that and it’s upsetting and dumb.
I bet myself I would find the word “smarmy” somewhere here. Agreed
The problem is that the “irrelevant” culture wars (identity politics, wedge issues) that don’t affect any given individuals directly are about important issues, and they’re being used by the rich as hostages. We can’t help but care about those issues, even if they don’t impact us directly, and the rich are using them as human shields while they take our watches and wallets and force us to sign over our properties