Mark with a Z@suppo.fi to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 days agoMeta denies torrenting porn to train AI, says downloads were for “personal use”arstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square41fedilinkarrow-up1246arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up1246arrow-down1external-linkMeta denies torrenting porn to train AI, says downloads were for “personal use”arstechnica.comMark with a Z@suppo.fi to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 days agomessage-square41fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareMachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up36·edit-28 days agoWhere did they get the idea that that’s a more respectable response? EDIT: Doesn’t/shouldn’t work for their liability either. Vocabulary fail on my part.
minus-squareMark with a Z@suppo.fiOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up37·8 days agoDignity doesn’t matter if it wins the case. Welcome to Zucc’s Fucc & Succ
minus-squareTm12@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·8 days agoZuck’s Fuck and Suck sounds like his product’s effects on society.
minus-squaretoo_high_for_this@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 days agoWe’re Sneed’s Feed & Seed now, please get it right
minus-squareexplodicle@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·8 days agoI think it’s more respectable to provide unfiltered internet than it is to profit off someone else’s work without paying them.
minus-squareFishFace@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·8 days agoThey didn’t claim it was respectable, they claimed it made them not liable? Where’d you get this idea?
minus-squareMachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·8 days agoDoesn’t/shouldn’t work for their liability either. Vocabulary fail on my part.
minus-squareFishFace@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 days agoWhy should a company be legally responsible for copyright infringement of its employees, if it wasn’t something they did for work?
Where did they get the idea that that’s a more respectable response?
EDIT: Doesn’t/shouldn’t work for their liability either. Vocabulary fail on my part.
Dignity doesn’t matter if it wins the case.
Welcome to Zucc’s Fucc & Succ
Zuck’s Fuck and Suck sounds like his product’s effects on society.
We’re Sneed’s Feed & Seed now, please get it right
I think it’s more respectable to provide unfiltered internet than it is to profit off someone else’s work without paying them.
They didn’t claim it was respectable, they claimed it made them not liable? Where’d you get this idea?
Doesn’t/shouldn’t work for their liability either. Vocabulary fail on my part.
Why should a company be legally responsible for copyright infringement of its employees, if it wasn’t something they did for work?