• Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    9 days ago

    The principal really needs to read the law. This school is so fucked.

    https://codes.findlaw.com/az/title-15-education/az-rev-st-sect-15-120-02/

    The law in question only prohibits biological males from participating in female sports. It does not prohibit females from joining boys teams. Compare and contrast sections “B” and “C”:

    B. Athletic teams or sports designated for “females”, “women” or “girls” may not be open to students of the male sex.

    C. This section does not restrict the eligibility of any student to participate in any interscholastic or intramural athletic team or sport designated as being for “males”, “men” or “boys” or designated as “coed” or “mixed”.

    I also thought this was pretty interesting:

    E. Any student who is deprived of an athletic opportunity or suffers any direct or indirect harm as a result of a school knowingly violating this section has a private cause of action for injunctive relief, damages and any other relief available under law against the school.

    • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 days ago

      This is literally one of these first things they teach in a (at least NY public high schools) coaching course.

    • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      The law in question only prohibits biological males from participating in female sports. It does not prohibit females from joining boys teams.

      There’s a simple reason for that - the second sentence is required under current interpretations of Title IX, while the first is not. The argument for that is about girl’s sports being a sort of protected space for girls, so it’s OK to bar non-girls (however your jurisdiction chooses to define that) from girls sports, but “boys” sports are actually for everyone who can compete.