• CameronDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Remote start is what I want personally. Timers get 90% of the way there, but if you want to run your machine when power is cheap, needs a bit more granularity. Also, end notification is one thing, but getting a “remaining time” status is also useful for the particularly lazy among us :)

    • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Ah, my power isn’t cheaper at certain times, so I didn’t think of that. I wonder if you could control and monitor all of it with an ESP32.

      • CameronDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        Probably could, but thats messy and out of reach for most of the general public. I’d consider myself capable, and I still haven’t done it despite wanting to.

        I’d settle for appliances providing a standardised port for control/monitoring, that you can plug in your own ESP32 controller. Harder to sell to the general public.

        • mangaskahn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          14 days ago

          Rheeme Econet devices do this. They have an app to control them, but there’s also a diagnostic port that exposes everything in the app and a lot more. There’s an esp32 project that connects to the port and brings all of that into Home Assistant, no app or wifi needed.

      • bob_lemon@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        I’ve thought about soldering one to some of the indicator leds and the start button, but that would require a lot of disassembly that I couldn’t bother with yet.