return2ozma@lemmy.world to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoA Nobel Peace Prize for Trump? World leaders are lining upwww.usatoday.comexternal-linkmessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up113arrow-down11
arrow-up112arrow-down1external-linkA Nobel Peace Prize for Trump? World leaders are lining upwww.usatoday.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square27fedilink
minus-squareKairos@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoThat’s one isolated metric. This is probably better than sending an army.
minus-squareCenzorrll@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoIt’s a dumb metric as well, seeing as warfare evolves and modern drones were mostly untested before Bush 2.0. Bush did the beta testing, it worked. Obama continued their use. It’s like saying more people used iPhones in 2015 than in 2008.
minus-squareMagnum, P.I.@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoHow is that better. You do realize this is very sophisticated bombing. Would you rather have a guy run into your house or the house of your family or some super sonic mach 3 drone? What kind of contest is that anyway.
minus-squareKairos@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoI’d rather have neither. I’m just saying some isolated metric doesn’t give the full picture.
minus-squareLettyWhiterock@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-22 months agoI think it paints a strong picture if you think bombing/striking/whatever other countries is wrong.
minus-squareMagnum, P.I.@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months ago That’s one isolated metric. This is probably better than sending an army. Sounds like you were saying getting drone striked is probably better, but English is not my native language so you are probably right
minus-squareKairos@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·2 months agoIf I had a gun to my head and was forced to choose whether a ground/army invasion is better than the drone strike, I would choose the latter. However, I’d prefer neither happen.
minus-squareMagnum, P.I.@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoWhy do you want to die fast and give your life to the enemy like a gift? What is this, I american’t anymore
That’s one isolated metric. This is probably better than sending an army.
It’s a dumb metric as well, seeing as warfare evolves and modern drones were mostly untested before Bush 2.0.
Bush did the beta testing, it worked. Obama continued their use. It’s like saying more people used iPhones in 2015 than in 2008.
How is that better. You do realize this is very sophisticated bombing. Would you rather have a guy run into your house or the house of your family or some super sonic mach 3 drone? What kind of contest is that anyway.
I’d rather have neither. I’m just saying some isolated metric doesn’t give the full picture.
I think it paints a strong picture if you think bombing/striking/whatever other countries is wrong.
Sounds like you were saying getting drone striked is probably better, but English is not my native language so you are probably right
If I had a gun to my head and was forced to choose whether a ground/army invasion is better than the drone strike, I would choose the latter.
However, I’d prefer neither happen.
Why do you want to die fast and give your life to the enemy like a gift? What is this, I american’t anymore