May be phrasing it wrong, but I look at actions like Labor rights, Pride, Civil Rights, Black Panthers, etc. where actions of protesters felt much intense and made more of an impact in actually changing things vs now where there are protests but it feels like it constantly falls of deaf ears.

Have we just not hit that breaking point yet? Have we collectively been beat down so hard? Or have we forgotten how to truly fight for rights? Or… am I just completely off the mark and missing something else?

  • mapto@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    But should it be extreme? I reckon it should be effective instead. Whether effective means awareness, resignations or something else is a conversation that varies a lot from context to context.

      • ahornsirup@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Those do work better. Antagonising the people whose support you rely on to effect change is a horrible strategy, the more of a disturbance protests cause to the average person, the less likely said average person is to be supportive.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          Only this strategy has literally never worked. Your rights were secured by people who caused all kinds of disturbances. And in the first place anyone who still hasn’t taken a side is a fascist in denial or will never take a side.

        • Montagge@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          I was mad that the government was disappearing people, but then a protest made it so I couldn’t drive where I wanted to.