The feds will still go after it as an illegal drug when presented as recreational and the will keep the stigma going on forever. Furthermore it will keep a lot of talented people out of good job opportunities for smoking a joint after work instead of having a glass of wine.

    • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not to mention 38 states have legalized it for medical use. What is there to study with regard to removing the legal penalties federally?

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also, are there any studies supporting it being banned? As I understand it, it was a PR campaign and moral panic that lead to its ban on the first place, not anything rational.

      • A Phlaming Phoenix@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        The research at the time said not to ban it because it is reasonably safe for consumption and banning it would cause social unrest and distrust of the government. Check out “A Signal of Misunderstanding: The First Report of the National Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse”, a report from a commission created by Richard Nixon with the passage of the 1969 Narcotics Act.

      • na_th_an@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wish I could agree that we need studies to convince our rational leaders in government to make the rational actions based on available evidence, because that’s what drives changes in government.