Windows 3.1, launched in 1992, is likely not getting any updates. So, when CrowdStrike pushed the faulty update to all its customers, Southwest wasn’t affected (because it didn’t receive an update to begin with).

Aside from Windows 3.1, Southwest also uses Windows 95 for its staff scheduling system.

One X user suggested that the company switch to Windows XP—it’s also no longer updated, and it can run Windows 3.1 applications via compatibility mode.

  • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s a news article of a tweet that was originally a joke on a year-old article which says some were still on 3.1.

    That’s harder extrapolation than my grade-school essay assignments.

    • BossDj@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      I couldn’t find any sources either. In 2022, they had issues that were attributed to aging technology and reluctance to go digital on their processes, but nothing to suggest Windows 3.1

      The was a quote from a union rep that said their programs “looked like they were designed on Windows 95”.

    • Aatube@kbin.melroy.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      The tweet is from the founder of Android Authority and APKMirror, so while it’s indeed filmsy sourcing, the credibility hasn’t completely vanished.

    • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Amish, to the computerized world: “Think you’re really righteous? Think you’re pure of heart? Well, I know I’m a million times as humble as thou art!”

  • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Auto mechanics were also not affected, since they’ve been using the same computers since the Carter administration.

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Anyone using Windows, but not CrowdStrike was also unaffected. CrowdStrike had released crashy updates for Linux before.

  • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Once upon a time I couldn’t understand why companies and governments still used ancient computer systems running DOS, Win3.1, or 9x, or computers like C64s. “Upgrade! Your new systems will be far more powerful and efficient; and that means they’re better!” -teenage me at some point, probably.

    However, as I’ve gotten older I’ve realized that it’s because “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”. While Southwest may spend more money than necessary on maintenance due to the ancient systems needing now-specialized skills, those systems are also time-proven to be as functional and dependable as they need them to be. Ironically, they might actually be more secure than most modern systems due to a combination of decades of specialized security/stability patches they’ve probably had and simple security-through-obsolescence.

    Edit: misremembered the phrase, “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”.

    • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      It becomes an issue when hardware is involved. I’ve seen industrial machines with 386 based touchscreens. Things as simple as a PS2 keyboard start getting hard to find and downtime costs a lot.

    • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      While Southwest may spend more money than necessary on maintenance due to the ancient systems needing now-specialized skills, those systems are also time-proven to be as functional and dependable as they need them to be.

      So they spend more on maintenance, but the system is also dependable? That seems contradictory.

      • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Not really. A machine that only breaks down every 10 years but is expensive to repair could be considered dependable and expensive to maintain. Similarly, a machine that has expensive parts which rarely fail within their expected lifespan could be considered dependable and expensive to maintain.

        Edit: you’re also ignoring the cost of finding and hiring people who know how to maintain the systems. The systems themselves could be dependable, but the skills required to maintain them are expensive.

    • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      You just helped me realize all the people that make a big deal out of getting monthly “security” updates for their phones are probably just dumb teenagers!

      I hate mandatory updates with a fiery passion

      • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        To be fair to the kids, they are an entire generation indoctrinated with the religion of mobile devices being replaced annually and constant updates to everything to keep that dopamine hit as high as possible. They’ve been manipulated by big tech for profit.