GoDaddy really lived up to its bad reputation and recently changed their API rules. The rules are simple: either you own 10 (or 50) domains, you pay $20/month, or you don’t get the API. I personally didn’t get any communication, and this broke my DDNS setup. I am clearly not the only one judging from what I found online. A company this big gating an API behind such a steep price… So I will repeat what many people said before me (being right): don’t. use. GoDaddy.

  • John Richard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is what NameCheap does too. It’s freaking stupid. Domain registrations should not be managed by corporations.

    • loudwhisper@infosec.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      NameCheap

      WOW! I did not know that. I just checked and after a little search:

      We have certain requirements for activation to prevent system abuse. In order to have API enabled, your account should meet one of the following requirements:
      
      - have at least 20 domains under your account;
      - have at least $50 on your account balance;
      - have at least $50 spent within the last 2 years
      

      $50 in last 2 years is not much, but for those who renew for many years, it is still stupid.

      Ironically, Namecheap is what the people in https://github.com/navilg/godaddy-ddns/issues/32 migrated to!

      I really wish that domain registration was done in a different way, but even in current scenario, gutting features for such a basic service to extract a few bucks and risking losing customers…?

      • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        These are ancient holdovers. Nowadays DNS hosting with API is a dime a dozen. You may have to pay for it occasionally but it’s not going to be even close to $20/mo.

        • loudwhisper@infosec.pubOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          $20/month for a service that anyway is low traffic (especially for hobbyists) is a completely insane price. Even more insane is that their cheapest subscription still doesn’t offer any API access. I agree anyway, but are these staying in business just because they have a consolidated market share? Do they have access to more TLDs? I don’t know, I am genuinely confused. I have absolutely no reason whatsoever to even think of using GoDaddy again.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        That can’t be right. I only had two domains (one now) and I’ve been using the API just fine. And basically any purchase will clear those dollar amounts.

        • loudwhisper@infosec.pubOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          I found it on their FAQ.

          Yes, it is generally less restrictive, but… I have 4 domains, and now I have renewed all of them for the maximum amount. They will all expire after 2033. So unless I decide to add more domains (which is unlikely), I won’t spend a cent in the next ~9 years. I wonder if they really enforce it as it is written or they consider still the renewal an expense “split” over the duration.

          Still, I really don’t understand. You can - and should - have proper rate limits on the API. You have API keys that uniquely identify the source, what is “the abuse” they are trying to prevent this way…?

          • catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Not sure. Personally I only use it for Let’s Encrypt DNS challenges.

    • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m saying this for years, but a) it’s quite late (seems like a 1990s issue) and b) OpenNIC is a bit of a joke atm (but support it anyways)

      ICANN never should’ve been a creature of US-NTIA, but of the UN. The US has no right to decide for the digital world how everyone communiticates. No one really should (apart from about stuff like CSAM).

      • can@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I still think they are but maybe my needs are simple. It was definitely better when I switched over (from godaddy*) during one of the migrations.