If inciting an insurrection towards their own government is an action without legal repercussions, I don’t see how the law would be less lenient about straight up firing a gun at an opponent.
I by no means want any party to resolve to violent tactics. So even though I play with the thought, I really don’t want anything like it to happen. I am just curious if it’s actually the case that a sitting president has now effectively a licence to kill.
What am I missing?
So Biden could officially flood the supreme court with democrat judges, then officially ask them to revoke this stupid ruling?
They didn’t change anything other than reiterate what the president is immune from, what he has always been immune from and when he is not immune from prosecution