• Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    I disagree with their complaints. If AI was used in any way, it should be labelled as such, no matter how small the adjustments were.

      • deafboy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        To appease the artists worried about “fake” art somehow replacing the "real"art, while the big social somehow profits. They just didn’t think leopards would eat THEIR faces…

        • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          You aren’t wrong. It’s entirely about status and needing to stigmatize, penalize and limit “fake” art because the artists in question are worried it will cut into the work available to them in the form of things like commissions.