This is the first sovcit complaint I’ve seen that actually seems like it could be reasonable (emphasis on both “seems” and “could be”). Just wanting written confirmation from the bank that they don’t accept wacko, bullshit forms of payment doesn’t seem like a big deal.
I suspect we’re not getting the whole story. For example, maybe the bank is refusing to participate in the sovcit’s delaying tactics by not sending yet another letter explaining something that’s already been explained a dozen times before.
The bank isn’t refusing to send a letter, they’re just tired of talking in circles. The repo man is handling things now, and the tow truck is on its way.
This is the first sovcit complaint I’ve seen that actually seems like it could be reasonable (emphasis on both “seems” and “could be”). Just wanting written confirmation from the bank that they don’t accept wacko, bullshit forms of payment doesn’t seem like a big deal.
I suspect we’re not getting the whole story. For example, maybe the bank is refusing to participate in the sovcit’s delaying tactics by not sending yet another letter explaining something that’s already been explained a dozen times before.
The bank isn’t refusing to send a letter, they’re just tired of talking in circles. The repo man is handling things now, and the tow truck is on its way.
A letter refusing to accept is also basically a receipt, and not sending the note back is acceptance to the sovcits.
Ooh. Good point! I didn’t think of it that way!
And they will gladly gaslight everyone that “they never even answered and had to send a repo man to hide the truth! It’s all rigged for Big Repo”.
There’s no winning with logic.
Trying to use logic to understand a sovcits actions is a great way to make yourself as crazy as a sovcit.