I still can’t figure out if they think they are making sense, or if they are just as lost as the rest of us, and they are just hoping for the best, because someone told them these words have power.
Here’s a really good paper on SovCits. I think it’s intended to educate judges and other officials. It’s a little focused on NC, but most of it applies broadly.
Here’s a much longer and more detailed documentnin sov cits. From a judge in Canada.
It’s a seminal work on sov cits. Who they are, where they come from, what they are talking about, and how courts and lawyers can handle them. It goes through all their arguments.
I still can’t figure out if they think they are making sense, or if they are just as lost as the rest of us, and they are just hoping for the best, because someone told them these words have power.
Here’s a really good paper on SovCits. I think it’s intended to educate judges and other officials. It’s a little focused on NC, but most of it applies broadly.
This is really good, thanks. Helps me explain it better.
Here’s a much longer and more detailed documentnin sov cits. From a judge in Canada.
It’s a seminal work on sov cits. Who they are, where they come from, what they are talking about, and how courts and lawyers can handle them. It goes through all their arguments.
https://ca.vlex.com/vid/meads-v-meads-679794865
Meads vs Meads is a classic. It’s so good.
Also here are a whole whack of pseudolaw cases I very much enjoy: https://www.canlii.org/en/#search/sort=decisionDateDesc&text=Pseudolaw &searchId=2024-05-05T20%3A22%3A43%3A601%2F30daaa35e45b4fdbbbb4535c5c076fe0
Very handy search tool up there in Canada. Some real gems in there.
The whole site is an interesting rabbit hole to fall down. I’ve learned a lot about how child protection decisions are made, for example.
Power, that is what these words have that your words don’t. Me’s words are the best which is why me uses them. ME WANT HONEYCOMB!
I’s apologies, me is hungry.
Edit: I’ve reread this, and I’m truly sorry.