Windows as a software package would have never been affordable to individuals or local-level orgs in countries like India and Bangladesh (especially in the 2000’s) that are now powerhouses of IT. Same for many SE Asian, Eastern European, African and LatinoAmerican countries as well.

Had the OS been too difficult to pirate, educators and local institutions in these countries would have certainly shifted to Linux and the like. The fact that Windows could be pirated easily is the main factor that led to its ubiquity and allowed it to become a household name. Its rapid popularity in the '00s and early ‘10s cemented its status as the PC operating system. It is probably the same for Microsoft Office as well (it is still a part of many schools’ standard curricula).

The fact that Windows still remains pirateable to this day is perhaps intentional on Microsoft’s part.

  • Black616Angel@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Although I mostly agree with you, this is not true:

    The “worst” they do is stop you from using windows update

    The worst they do is practically force you to buy a windows license with most laptops and even some pre-built tower PCs.

    Yes there are some vendors/manufacturers who don’t force you or ask, if you want an Ubuntu/Mint/Pop_!OS or smth. but most just don’t give a shit.

    • umbrella@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      in my country vendors are forced to offer a free OS/no OS option.

      most new laptops here come with linux preinstalled lol