Was just talking at dinner with family, and it seems a logical action to ban circumcision, as in most cases, doesn’t have consent, and is a major (genitals are important) body modification. Can we ban it at the state level? Just a thought.

    • then_three_more@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 months ago

      Sounds pretty cultural to me, something that’s persisted for a hundred and twenty years (What’s that a quarter of your country’s history?) based on an over religious ideal and pushed by a capitalist.

        • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          “my dick’s cut, so my kid’s gonna have a cut dick

          Change the sex and genitalia in question, and this is basically what drives FGM. It’s mostly women who had it done to them that drive the practice forward. That’s how traditional practices work in general - you repeating what happened to you with your offspring, often long past the point where the original purpose (if any) has any value.

    • morphballganon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      He also was a proponent of circumcision as a means of preventing masturbation because it would make the penis too tight that stroking it would be painful

      … well, I for one am very glad he was mistaken in this point.