• Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Why people keep thinking the modern engineering can’t build pyramid like they used to when we have a 800m building straight up without the need of spreading the base to help with the balance? We could build one with the inside hollow if we wanted, it just have to answer the question of: why do we need another pyramid?

  • Mango@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Nigga that shit ain’t coincidence! It’s on purpose except for the ley lines shit you just made up!

  • niktemadur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Quick, somebody buy an NFT of this and yank it out of circulation, before word gets out and by then it’ll be too late!

  • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    There’s no way that’s actually Neil deGrasse Tyson unless he had a mental break sometime in the past couple years. That said, they’re not wrong.

    There’s no way we’d build something like that nowadays, but that’s not due to a lack of technology; it’s because we love to sacrifice quality for money, and you need quality for a structure like that to stand for such a long time.

    • MxM111@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Has nothing to do with quality, but with the fact this is near monolithic pyramid (it not empty inside as most buildings are today). I think the garbage piles we create today will also stand the test of times for the same reason. That, plus that lander on the moon.

    • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      A building with nearly no internal space is basically useless. We have and do build things of similar shape (Luxor in LV, and others ) that are actually usable on the inside.

      A large part of the lack of longevity in our current buildings is due to reliance on steel, which is prone to corrosion unless constantly maintained. And it’s hard to maintain steel rebar that’s embedded in concrete without breaking everything and rebuilding it.

      It’s essentially a trade-off - steel enables structures to be built in ways that are utterly impossible without it, but at the cost of ultimate longevity.

      • wvstolzing@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        The mention of ‘laylines’ is enough of a clue by itself; and the ‘lining up with the stars’ is pure unadulterated Graham Hancock / atlantis grifter bullshit.

          • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            There are infinite stars in every direction. Everything lines up with a star if you track it far enough. 🤷🏻‍♂️

          • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            You’d think if it was made by hyper technologically advanced aliens, they would be able to measure it on the nanometre.

  • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    There is some evidence to suggest the great pyramid, if not all 3, have rubble from making the blocks filling the spaces that are unseen and not structural. That would simplify and speed up it’s construction considerably. Rubble has been observed in at least one location behind the inner structure. Egypt is not a fan of people drilling into their landmark, so any degree of confirmation is long away.