That conversation doesn’t make any damn sense. Why would an interviewer ask arithmetic questions to check the ml claim?
It’s basically a joke on how gradient descent works in machine learning.
It would have been more obviously gradient descent if they didnt start with 0, so the first gradient wasn’t the same as the second answer. I thought they were just repeating the last correct answer.
Why ai would be used on a math operator beats me, but hey ho.
this is a conversation from 2047. the Interviewer is checking if they are speaking with an AI/Robot
Shoulda used a Voight-Kampff test.
Excuse my ignorance, but what 2047?
I think they’re referring to the year.
oh. I thought he might be referring to a book, movie or game.
ai: I detect numbers, create a variable called Numbersdetected.
int (“Numbersdetected” = 0);
Now it has a value of 16.
Numbersdetected = 16;
Somebody wants the value of Numbersdetected.
*query (“Numbersdetected”);Blade runner logic. Ask that exposing question. Get an answer.
because
Got it:
if (a == 7 and b == 9): return 16 elif (a == 10 and b == 20): return 20 else: return 18
